- Staff
- #1
Suggestion Topic: 5.6 Kidnapping
Suggestion Description: Lately, I have seen many hostage situations, that were initiated, with the hostage treated as an asset, to kill 1-2 police officers, and not in a purpose of actually carrying out a hostage situation as intended. Such like:
medal.tv
In my opinion, this is not a way it would be played out IRL. One person, with a pistol, calling out a hostage situation, in order to kill one or two officers, and "Increase their chances of fleeing the police". IRL the hostage taker would definately negotiate, and I belive that free passage would definately increase the chances of escaping much more, than killing officers.
My suggestion is adding to the rule: "Taking a hostage, with a sole purpose of initiating a shootout with the police is not permitted". As the hostage takers, should definately try to negotiate, rather than shoot that CPL, SGT or TFU officer dealing with the hostage situation, as this would definately not increase the chances as much, as negotiating free passage.
In some cases it might even be seen as 3.4, as 1 guy with a pistol, has no chance to overcome several officers, however it is kind of permitted, as 9.4 is violent crime.
The charges for 9.4 are not as harsh as 9.2 or 9.5, that is onlny 4y 3k so I belive it should be considered not to allow suspects immediately open fire at the police.
Why should this be added?:
- Making hostages assets for negotiating, rather than creating a bloodbath
- Adding more realism to hostage situations
- Reduced number of a massive shootout between police and hostage takers, when hostages are still held hostage
What negatives could this have?:
- More complicated work for staff, dealing with complex situtaions like that.
Suggestion Description: Lately, I have seen many hostage situations, that were initiated, with the hostage treated as an asset, to kill 1-2 police officers, and not in a purpose of actually carrying out a hostage situation as intended. Such like:
top 1 hostage situations - Clipped with Medal.tv
8 Views. Watch top 1 hostage situations and millions of other Garry's Mod videos on Medal, the #1 Game Clip Platform.
medal.tv
In my opinion, this is not a way it would be played out IRL. One person, with a pistol, calling out a hostage situation, in order to kill one or two officers, and "Increase their chances of fleeing the police". IRL the hostage taker would definately negotiate, and I belive that free passage would definately increase the chances of escaping much more, than killing officers.
My suggestion is adding to the rule: "Taking a hostage, with a sole purpose of initiating a shootout with the police is not permitted". As the hostage takers, should definately try to negotiate, rather than shoot that CPL, SGT or TFU officer dealing with the hostage situation, as this would definately not increase the chances as much, as negotiating free passage.
In some cases it might even be seen as 3.4, as 1 guy with a pistol, has no chance to overcome several officers, however it is kind of permitted, as 9.4 is violent crime.
The charges for 9.4 are not as harsh as 9.2 or 9.5, that is onlny 4y 3k so I belive it should be considered not to allow suspects immediately open fire at the police.
Why should this be added?:
- Making hostages assets for negotiating, rather than creating a bloodbath
- Adding more realism to hostage situations
- Reduced number of a massive shootout between police and hostage takers, when hostages are still held hostage
What negatives could this have?:
- More complicated work for staff, dealing with complex situtaions like that.
