- Staff
- #1
What rule do you wish to Edit: 2.4 Constructive supports
Your version of the rule: Users should only reply to the threads within the Ban Appeal, Warning Dispute, Refund Request and Action Request section if they were directly involved in the situation in question. Excluding the Ban Appeal section, users when replying must also provide further, relevant information about the matter. When replying to Suggestions and Staff Applications users are expected to be constructive with their replies by providing their reasoning.
Why do you believe this rule should be Edited: The only way to reply to Action Requests, Ban Disputes, Refund Requests and Warning Disputes is if you were involved in the situation even if you do not have anything useful to add thus being able to simply state your opinion which can be biased and/or similar. This rule was edited to avoid these not needed replies hence the reason why I believe it should be edited like that.
EDIT: I meant relevant, not constructive.
Your version of the rule: Users should only reply to the threads within the Ban Appeal, Warning Dispute, Refund Request and Action Request section if they were directly involved in the situation in question. Excluding the Ban Appeal section, users when replying must also provide further, relevant information about the matter. When replying to Suggestions and Staff Applications users are expected to be constructive with their replies by providing their reasoning.
Why do you believe this rule should be Edited: The only way to reply to Action Requests, Ban Disputes, Refund Requests and Warning Disputes is if you were involved in the situation even if you do not have anything useful to add thus being able to simply state your opinion which can be biased and/or similar. This rule was edited to avoid these not needed replies hence the reason why I believe it should be edited like that.
EDIT: I meant relevant, not constructive.
Last edited:
