Warning Dispute (RespectMyVoid)

Mak

Messages
143
Reaction score
405
Points
430
Location
Greenland
Punishment Type: Warning
Appeal Type: Dispute[Evidence]
Which staff member issued the punishment?: @RespectMyVoid
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: Not Applicable

Your Steam Name: Mak
Your Roleplay Name: Jah Mylan
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:99753706

Why were you punished?: 2.5 - User shot an individual who posed no immediate threat to them during a shootout, while the user was engaging that person’s organization members with valid KOS. // accepted AR

Why should this appeal be considered?: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/c...?invite=cr-MSxSdXosMTA0NTk0NTAx&v=87&tab=home

The person I shot and killed was not uninvolved. Not only did they remain in the vehicle for a solid 8 seconds after their car got shot out, they started driving their armed friends towards the shots, putting themselves in the middle of the shootout clearly involving themselves - in addition to this, the guy I shot had a Scar on his back and was clearly running for cover. If he wanted to be uninvolved in the situation, he should've used one of his 8 given seconds to get out and surrender, or just have ran from the start instead of driving head first into the shootout. He clearly involved himself, and was just running for cover. He's posing an obvious threat to not only my life but Kanan's as well. It's pretty blatant that if he reached cover he would've pulled the Scar out and began helping his friends, which I was not gonna let happen.

I have seen many situations similar to this in a cop aspect where visibly armed armed civilians are running away and cops shoot them to ensure the safety of themselves and that's what I was doing here in the same aspect.
 
Last edited:




After watching both POVs, it is clear that the user was a threat and should have reacted better if they didn't want to be involved in that situation.

The user was clearly associated with the players who gunpointed you earlier in the video above (this is further confirmed to us since the user even gave callouts on Teamspeak saying “he's on your right”).

The user then jumped out of the same car that was associated with the players who gunpointed you and attempted to run into Lakeview. Since the user was visibly armed, it is reasonable to believe that he would have turned around and used his weapon to assist his friends.

As such, we do not believe rule 2.5 was violated here, as again, the user was involved in the situation and had opportunities to surrender.

Your warning will be removed

Reviewed with @Galle @ThePeak @Locksmith @Marcusy
 
Back
Top