3.4 to use a pistol
- Thread starter Jenga
- Start date
rewevie
Communication Banned
- Messages
- 107
- Reaction score
- 270
- Points
- 335
Garrysmod 2020.09.30 - 01.32.45.10.DVR_Trim
Watch "Garrysmod 2020.09.30 - 01.32.45.10.DVR_Trim" on Streamable.
0:57 bullshit fuck you 7mar
this man wipes tfu with lugers like its nothing
just saying the argument at the start of the video sets a very dangerous precedence for the future, can the same be applied when 6 people are raiding one person? should he just surrender instead in order to value his life and let the raiders take his shit?
nice video
just saying the argument at the start of the video sets a very dangerous precedence for the future, can the same be applied when 6 people are raiding one person? should he just surrender instead in order to value his life and let the raiders take his shit?
nice video
- Thread starter
- #4
but who asked?
- Thread starter
- #6
if you wanted to ban me so bad then all you had to do is watch me skip the intersection red light, no need to spend 2 hours in ts digging for a reasonI'll defend myself as you raise a good point @Blocked.
I'm pretty sure I explained that the reason you were banned was not for going up against 6 cops with a pistol, however it's pretty self-explanatory why that's an issue to me. The reason you were banned was because after being GP'ed out of a car for a traffic stop (don't ask me man), you decided it was time to assassinate the mayor and started shooting while completely outnumbered. To set the record, taking a risk and failing is not always 3.4; you just need to be able to decipher between when it's suicide and when you have an actual chance.
Nice montage though
Just making you aware he was not outnumbered we were same amount as cops we had 6 of us 1 with pistol, 4 with smgs and 1 with shotguns. We were also about to shoot the cops anyway to kill the mayor hence why all of us were there because they were transporting him around with 40%+ Sales taxI'll defend myself as you raise a good point @Blocked.
I'm pretty sure I explained that the reason you were banned was not for going up against 6 cops with a pistol, however it's pretty self-explanatory why that's an issue to me. The reason you were banned was because after being GP'ed out of a car for a traffic stop (don't ask me man), you decided it was time to assassinate the mayor and started shooting while completely outnumbered. To set the record, taking a risk and failing is not always 3.4; you just need to be able to decipher between when it's suicide and when you have an actual chance.
Nice montage though
The thing is 3-4 of us were in the immediate area, not to mention the person with him in the car with a shotgun, I was at the red light clarky was behind the police, DB was across from me https://prnt.sc/usmtigI'll defend myself as you raise a good point @Blocked.
I'm pretty sure I explained that the reason you were banned was not for going up against 6 cops with a pistol, however it's pretty self-explanatory why that's an issue to me. The reason you were banned was because after being GP'ed out of a car for a traffic stop (don't ask me man), you decided it was time to assassinate the mayor and started shooting while completely outnumbered. To set the record, taking a risk and failing is not always 3.4; you just need to be able to decipher between when it's suicide and when you have an actual chance.
Nice montage though
Deleted member 5920
Guest
That's different because the raiders initiate the situation not the defender. That's not even slightly comparable. Next time you have a bright idea like this just go speak into a paper bag, close it then burn it. You'll still have the same impact on the argument as well!
- Thread starter
- #10
` unbind f6
I cannot understand why the first part had to be added? You clearly disagree with the ban, so you should make a dispute.
Would've been a fun video to watch if it didn't instantly agitate me.
Would've been a fun video to watch if it didn't instantly agitate me.
rewevie
Communication Banned
- Messages
- 107
- Reaction score
- 270
- Points
- 335
- Staff
- #13
This is a good point and an observation I did somewhat make, but that doesn’t excuse the fact that he started assassination to loophole a ticket. Either way, he can dispute the ban if he feels it to be invalid.
You say loophole but we were about to box him in and kill him anyway.
- Thread starter
- #15
the assassination was to be started regardless
the same principle applies
this is not a warning but a ban, ill check in on why it hasnt been done yet however.
you know its nothing personal but liberal use of dumb rating would be applied were it to still exist
optimistic is the new dumb rating
its exactly comparable because the risk to life is directly comparable; who initiates doesnt matter regardless - the decision to initiate the situation was going to be made by others therefore jenga just did it himself; he was going to be forced into a 1v6 but took it on his own terms so if anything the situation @Blocked described is a more significant risk as its not on your own terms?
lol
