Action Request (ISTGYouAnnoyingASF)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jay

Messages
82
Reaction score
238
Points
325
Location
Parts Unknown
Your Steam Name: crazy crazy
Your Roleplay Name: Abdulmanap Savage
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:145314060

Player's Steam Name: ISTGYouAnnoyingASF
Player's Roleplay Name: Jaxson Wood
Player's SteamID: STEAM_0:1:745914229

Why should this player be punished?: 3.18- stored guns during a counter raid.

We just finished defending a raid on our apartment, after going outside 2 of my org members died to someone else counter raiding so I held the apartment. During this time they stored both weapons before returning to finish the counter raid. 3.18 states that players must not store items while their life is in imminent danger. They are doing a counter raid so their life is obviously in imminent danger as they're going to continue combat. I heard him say "Cover me while I store" but this isn't a valid loophole to the rule considering the counter raid is still active. With this logic, anyone defending an apartment would be allowed to store as long as someone is watching the entrance.

Evidence Link:
 
i stored because idk who it was but it was someone who was defending with u ran into p3 and locked door so our life wasnt really in danger while i stored
 
i stored because idk who it was but it was someone who was defending with u ran into p3 and locked door so our life wasnt really in danger while i stored
Like i said above, just because someone is holding the door it doesn't mean you can store because your still going to re-engage in combat again. Your life is in imminent danger because u are going to continue the counter raid.
 



@deago I have requested the following demo: perpheads_demo_2025-4-28 07-24-06. The next time you join the server, please accept the prompt you will receive for the demo. If you are unable to join the server, upload the demo and give it to me.​
 




After reviewing the situation by watching @deago demo, it was shown that deago decided to store the guns and then continue the raid. Given the fact that he decided to re-engage in combat, @deago will receive a 3 days ban for breaking 3.18. The better option for @deago would have been to simply leave, in that case 3.18 wouldn't have been broken, as he wouldn't be re-engaging in combat.

Reviewed with @Medium
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top