- Staff
- #1
Your Steam/In-game Name: Aquaa / Trayvon Tay
His/Her Steam/In-game Name: Orzel / Mac Rosiak ?
His/Her SteamID: STEAM_0:0:39685259
Why Should This Player Be Punished: Player broke rule 2.5 Excessive Negativity by committing actions that were excessively negative and weren't proportionate to what was presented. There was an altercation between us exchanging curse words and then we began fighting, he told me that it will be a 1v1 and no weapons but he wants to do it somewhere private so he doesn't get caught by police. The fight continued until he unholstered a firearm, and in response I of course backed up but he killed me anyways. I feel that the smarter thing to do was to gunpoint me instead of killing me which is what blew the situation out of proportion. There was a similar situation that occurred yesterday in which he killed me whilst I was unarmed after punching him a few times, @Gimic was in the sit and we came to a consensus that a verbal would be appropriate because he understood and was apologetic however I do not see him learning from his mistakes because not even 24 hours later he has done something similar. He claims that he killed me because I continued punching him under gunpoint but as you can see in the video, that was not the case. He also claimed that I was doing a severe amount of damage which is also falsified, I have 1 strength and punched him 5 times in total which would bring him to Slightly injured (Tested this with @Collier by punching him 5 times in the head)
Evidence:
His/Her Steam/In-game Name: Orzel / Mac Rosiak ?
His/Her SteamID: STEAM_0:0:39685259
Why Should This Player Be Punished: Player broke rule 2.5 Excessive Negativity by committing actions that were excessively negative and weren't proportionate to what was presented. There was an altercation between us exchanging curse words and then we began fighting, he told me that it will be a 1v1 and no weapons but he wants to do it somewhere private so he doesn't get caught by police. The fight continued until he unholstered a firearm, and in response I of course backed up but he killed me anyways. I feel that the smarter thing to do was to gunpoint me instead of killing me which is what blew the situation out of proportion. There was a similar situation that occurred yesterday in which he killed me whilst I was unarmed after punching him a few times, @Gimic was in the sit and we came to a consensus that a verbal would be appropriate because he understood and was apologetic however I do not see him learning from his mistakes because not even 24 hours later he has done something similar. He claims that he killed me because I continued punching him under gunpoint but as you can see in the video, that was not the case. He also claimed that I was doing a severe amount of damage which is also falsified, I have 1 strength and punched him 5 times in total which would bring him to Slightly injured (Tested this with @Collier by punching him 5 times in the head)
Evidence:
