Ban Dispute (CREEPIS)

[Goblin]

Punishment Type: Ban
Punishment Subtype: Server Ban
Appeal Type: Dispute[Evidence]
Which staff member issued the punishment?: @Creepis
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: Permanent

Your Steam Name: Goblin
Your Roleplay Name: Priti Nightfall
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:200951260

Why were you punished?: 1.6, 3.20 - Refusing to upload demo related to an investigation to a prior report, disconnecting immediately upon death in a raid and refusing to upload a demo on the third request.

Why should this appeal be considered?: Creepis dm'd me "Creepis — 18:12
I think I'll just go through your demo for this
should be easier
unless you have a clip of the whole sit
"

some time later I hop on denied a request when I joined as I was going to dm him the video and there was a 2nd request while i was on the raid, once did my 1 raid and I died, i left the server and I instantly sent the video that i had prepared as it was uploading but creepis apparentaly banned me and then tried telling me that I didn't dm him that I went with the video pathway but then I proceeded to offer him to send him the demo he ignored the message also to add on creepis banned me for 3.20 part because I left on black screen (at the time i left there was no demo request pop up, which he also admitted by saying "Creepis — 19:21
it probably didnt go through because you disconnected too fast." also creepis for some reason said this "full black doesnt mean you can DC" when clearly rules say this "You must wait until 10 minutes have passed since committing a crime, unless the crime has been resolved (you were charged or absolved)"

Additional Information: Keep in mind, I couldn't care less sending the demo.

 

[Acerius]

Staff will begin looking at this in due course, but I thought it would be worth clarifying something with you:

Additional Information: Keep in mind, I couldn't care less sending the demo.

If this is the case, then why did you actively decline the demo request not once, but twice? I just find it a bit strange considering that, even if you were going to provide Creepis with a recording, what harm providing said demo would have had anyway?

 

[Goblin]

what harm providing said demo would have had anyway?

No harm, I just chose to send the video as it's easier for him to look through and deal with the situation.

 

[Acerius]

No harm, I just chose to send the video as it's easier for him to look through and deal with the situation.

In which case, could you please upload perpheads_demo_2026-3-8 17-47-39.dem and provide a link? If you don't want it publicly available feel free to do it in a DM, and I can provide it to the staff who will be reviewing this.

 

[Acerius]

Your ban reason and length has been amended by @Creepis following a demo review:

Do you still wish to proceed with disputing this, based on the new reasoning?

 

[Goblin]

Yes the 1.6 part still doesn't make sense, I denied the demo request to post a clip as mentioned above to make it easier for him, Creepis never questioned me on why I was denying them as he gave me 2 options and as soon as I went off the server I instantly supplied him with the following clip when I saw the video was uploaded.

 

[Megasaw]

It was clear that the staff member wanted to obtain more information about the situation, which is why they requested your demo. However, you denied this request not once, but twice. Even if you provided your POV via a clip, when a staff member asks for your demo in order to gather more relevant information, you are expected to cooperate. It even states this in the notification when you are demo requested.

I do not see an issue with the 1.6 punishment, as it ultimately resulted in you conceding your demo. In future, please comply when you get a demo requested for a report.

Reviewed with @mocho @ThePeak