Punishment Type: Ban
Punishment Subtype: Server Ban
Appeal Type: Dispute[Evidence]
Which staff member issued the punishment?: @Daan
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: 2 Weeks
Your Steam Name: lvl 100 elite hacker boss
Your Roleplay Name: Sally Slobbernoker
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:4980326
Why were you punished?: 2.5 - The player initiated a raid by shooting at a player that has walked out of their property towards their vehicle to store their rifle.
Why should this appeal be considered?: I was banned because I walked up to Southgate after there was a meth explosion inside. I watched a person leaving the base and go to his car and enter his trunk with a rifle on his back and I shot him dead as he was directly outside his own base while armed after just leaving which means if I don't kill him he is a major threat to us as he can drive away and shoot us from behind or just pick up his gun if we leave him unaccompanied for a moment. This kill was to initiate the raid which is the problem that the staff member had with it however if we crowbarred to start it he would've just shot us and we would have risked our lives for no reason. The staff member did not provide a specific line or area of rule 2.5 and just posted the whole rule and then the vague line at the beginning which doesn't pertain to any specific situations. He kept saying I was just killing a random person for no reason when this isn't the case as I killed an armed defender because he was armed and I watched him leave the property. This clearly showed a reason and gain by killing him as well as the negatives of letting him live which shows it wasn't excessively negative to kill him. I understand that it is more favourable for roleplay to gunpoint him but gun pointing him risks our lives and whole raid for no reason.
It has been a part of the game where you are allowed to kill armed defenders to initiate a raid for the longest time and this ban seemed to just be a lack of the staff members knowledge after the rule was updated as he couldn't provide proper information on why it was actually against the rule or specify what area he just kept posting the whole rule and saying its 2.5 which seems entirely unhelpful and a clear reach for a ban.
Additional Information: I was not given the evidence by the staff but I can provide proof from my demo of the interaction if needed
Punishment Subtype: Server Ban
Appeal Type: Dispute[Evidence]
Which staff member issued the punishment?: @Daan
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: 2 Weeks
Your Steam Name: lvl 100 elite hacker boss
Your Roleplay Name: Sally Slobbernoker
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:4980326
Why were you punished?: 2.5 - The player initiated a raid by shooting at a player that has walked out of their property towards their vehicle to store their rifle.
Why should this appeal be considered?: I was banned because I walked up to Southgate after there was a meth explosion inside. I watched a person leaving the base and go to his car and enter his trunk with a rifle on his back and I shot him dead as he was directly outside his own base while armed after just leaving which means if I don't kill him he is a major threat to us as he can drive away and shoot us from behind or just pick up his gun if we leave him unaccompanied for a moment. This kill was to initiate the raid which is the problem that the staff member had with it however if we crowbarred to start it he would've just shot us and we would have risked our lives for no reason. The staff member did not provide a specific line or area of rule 2.5 and just posted the whole rule and then the vague line at the beginning which doesn't pertain to any specific situations. He kept saying I was just killing a random person for no reason when this isn't the case as I killed an armed defender because he was armed and I watched him leave the property. This clearly showed a reason and gain by killing him as well as the negatives of letting him live which shows it wasn't excessively negative to kill him. I understand that it is more favourable for roleplay to gunpoint him but gun pointing him risks our lives and whole raid for no reason.
It has been a part of the game where you are allowed to kill armed defenders to initiate a raid for the longest time and this ban seemed to just be a lack of the staff members knowledge after the rule was updated as he couldn't provide proper information on why it was actually against the rule or specify what area he just kept posting the whole rule and saying its 2.5 which seems entirely unhelpful and a clear reach for a ban.
Additional Information: I was not given the evidence by the staff but I can provide proof from my demo of the interaction if needed
