Ban Request on Ben Anderson (BA98)

[joey]

Inspire, did you commit any previous high crimes that would have got you jailed for long, in that life, that you were still on the run for? If so: this whole RP situation faults at Ben Anderson and the swat. If not: Then that's breaking 3.4, really making all the RP based round that really stupid. The reason this would break 3.4 is because why would you risk going to jail for around 5-7 years just for a traffic ticket, if you had no previous crimes?

IF; You had: murdered, robbed the bank, were warranted in anyway before gun-pointing the officer:
+Support

Yet, IF; You had no crimes that would have given you a sentence:
-Support


If the person in question: "Inspire" may respond to this post I'd greatly appreciate it.

 

[JARRE]

Clear +support
The officers/SWAT really don't give a fck about hostages/gunpoint and they always will shoot you or do what ever they want to


Off topic:
I have this strong feeling the first video and the last 45 seconds is almost exactly the same as what happend with me.
-He tried to take on the 'whole' police force
-There was 1 officer and 3 SWAT, total of 4
-He had a desert eagle
-He tried to save a friend
-We both went to prison. (Most likely)
-He didn't got banned but i did ??

 

[LinkerNippel]

+Support. Ben was definitly threatening the officers life more than the officer was in danger anyway. If SWAT just went straight away, possibly no big killing and shooting would have happened.. (created on iPad, couldn't put much effort in it)

 

[Torvald]

+/-Support
I am only supporting this if Inspire also gets a warning for breaking 3.4.

 

[BA98]

tick-53600
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B745VKlBUgpOdTR1TUppck91NG8/view?usp=sharing
my pov and also there was a sniper set up if you look and i had a clear shot on him as the cop was couched and being shot in the head you cant pull a trigger and would be knocked back,

 

[Murtsley]

Obviously the evidence shows two separate cases of the same thing happening, clearly he doesn't know what he's doing wrong, he should get a warning for this, the people should get their weapons refunded and that should be that, because if he did know what he was doing wrong, that wouldn't have happened at Scrappy Joe's.

 

[Walker]

+Support The swat did not give a dam about the hostages.

 

[joey]

I add to this whole thread, Inspire would not give a demo to me so I go another demo from another player (Ben) In the video, I narrate it, it explains: how the swat should only be warned at maximum, (I also used this in inspires Ban req. sorry for partial focus upon him in narration)

Narration: https://mega.co.nz/#!AoYmRIib!uCrogXwRQKVmWDL1EwasmYFkUccV6XC_q43IYXK_Z5w
Demo: https://mega.co.nz/#!coxx1YRR!Po5DSZklU12REcjrfi1kMlReme5sCaXS1EL7bbv5a4s
53000

 

[Rutger]

I feel like BA98 should have tried harder to make sure the hostage was going to be all right in both of these situations, but I don't really feel like it's immediately worth a ban as in my eyes he wasn't fully aware of the hostage situation in both cases so he'll be receiving a warning instead.

Accepted