- Messages
- 844
- Reaction score
- 913
- Points
- 605
Suggestion Title: Emergency weapons authorization
Suggestion Description: Due to the extreme prevalence of PD raids, I think an adjustment may be in order for the police department. I don't think this idea will be popular to be fair, but I wanted to suggest it regardless.
During a PD lockdown, or a confirmed raid (A police door is being broken into), a supervisor on duty could temporarily authorize issue of the Remington shotgun to Senior Officers. This would further equip the police department for this hazard, as realistically speaking this is unquestionably the most hostile and dangerous situation the PD can encounter.
I suggest that in this situation, the supervisor can issue a command authorizing Senior Officers to be issued a shotgun from the armory. This shotgun is to be used solely for defense of the police department, and is not to be taken off the property. This includes the building itself, and the immediate surroundings (Sidewalks and parking lot, but not say to the hospital and storage.) This shotgun must be returned IMMEDIATELY once the all-clear is issued.
While an additional liability issue, this is an extreme circumstance, and given its frequency, I feel it's an appropriate response. While Corporals+ can already access this, (And are required to pass additional checks to do so) I feel that granting this temporarily to Senior Officers who have already managed to demonstrate knowledge of policy and have not been cited for excessive force would not be a liability in excess of the potential benefits to officer safety. While this could be extreme, this is a situation in which the intent of the suspects is extremely clear.
They are here to break someone out, and you are in their way.
In this situation, an officer already will be ready to shoot to kill with their handguns, and the assailants are undoubtedly going to be heavily armed. Providing them with a more effective means to stop a threat for this specific circumstance, could be the difference between a dangerous criminal being put back on the street, or even the officer being able to go home to their family that night.
This is a serious measure, for an extreme circumstance.
Why should this be added?:
- Increased deterrent against PD raids
- Officer Safety
- More effective suppression of threats
- Allows officers who are not interested in TFU to more effectively assist in the most hostile situation the PD encounters
What negatives could this have?:
- PD Will likely say this is a liability concern and should require additional certification
- People may think the PD is too hard to raid
- Requires additional supervisory duties in enforcing policy
- Can lead to potential firearms violations, whether intentionally abused or not
What problem would this suggestion solve?: The PD being raided is already a fight-or-flight situation. If heavier weapons are available in the armory, realistically speaking it would be better to have officers go down using weapons they're not approved for than to futher risk outright losing the police department (And, while not in gameplay in RP,) losing the armory itself and the weapons inside.
Suggestion Description: Due to the extreme prevalence of PD raids, I think an adjustment may be in order for the police department. I don't think this idea will be popular to be fair, but I wanted to suggest it regardless.
During a PD lockdown, or a confirmed raid (A police door is being broken into), a supervisor on duty could temporarily authorize issue of the Remington shotgun to Senior Officers. This would further equip the police department for this hazard, as realistically speaking this is unquestionably the most hostile and dangerous situation the PD can encounter.
I suggest that in this situation, the supervisor can issue a command authorizing Senior Officers to be issued a shotgun from the armory. This shotgun is to be used solely for defense of the police department, and is not to be taken off the property. This includes the building itself, and the immediate surroundings (Sidewalks and parking lot, but not say to the hospital and storage.) This shotgun must be returned IMMEDIATELY once the all-clear is issued.
While an additional liability issue, this is an extreme circumstance, and given its frequency, I feel it's an appropriate response. While Corporals+ can already access this, (And are required to pass additional checks to do so) I feel that granting this temporarily to Senior Officers who have already managed to demonstrate knowledge of policy and have not been cited for excessive force would not be a liability in excess of the potential benefits to officer safety. While this could be extreme, this is a situation in which the intent of the suspects is extremely clear.
They are here to break someone out, and you are in their way.
In this situation, an officer already will be ready to shoot to kill with their handguns, and the assailants are undoubtedly going to be heavily armed. Providing them with a more effective means to stop a threat for this specific circumstance, could be the difference between a dangerous criminal being put back on the street, or even the officer being able to go home to their family that night.
This is a serious measure, for an extreme circumstance.
Why should this be added?:
- Increased deterrent against PD raids
- Officer Safety
- More effective suppression of threats
- Allows officers who are not interested in TFU to more effectively assist in the most hostile situation the PD encounters
What negatives could this have?:
- PD Will likely say this is a liability concern and should require additional certification
- People may think the PD is too hard to raid
- Requires additional supervisory duties in enforcing policy
- Can lead to potential firearms violations, whether intentionally abused or not
What problem would this suggestion solve?: The PD being raided is already a fight-or-flight situation. If heavier weapons are available in the armory, realistically speaking it would be better to have officers go down using weapons they're not approved for than to futher risk outright losing the police department (And, while not in gameplay in RP,) losing the armory itself and the weapons inside.




