- Messages
- 3,692
- Reaction score
- 3,187
- Points
- 1,325
- Staff
- #1
Is this a new law or a change to a current law: (Concept)
Description:
If you are not familiar with the difference, here is a very basic description of each term in how it would work on PERP.
I believe that 'Right to Arrest' should be modified so that it is completely legal to arrest a person under suspicion of an offence but you do not have full evidence to support it. Below is a possible change to the 'Right to Arrest' law.
And below a concept 'Right to Charge' law.
Why should this change be made: As it currently stands, the right to arrest law is very unrealistic and I really hate to tell people they are being detained rather than 'arrested on suspicion of an offence'. So really most of the benefit from this law comes down to realism.
What is the aim of this change: It should create a more realistic and professional arrest procedure.
Additional Information: Charging an offender doesn't work exactly like said in this thread as we don't actually have a court system, look it up if you're interested in how it works (or join paralake crime agency xd).
Description:
If you are not familiar with the difference, here is a very basic description of each term in how it would work on PERP.
Charge - (placing them in jail, you are confident they have committed an offence beyond all reasonable doubt).
Arrest - (an allegation has been made whether by you or another and you are placing them under arrest for the purposes of an interview and they can be put in a holding cell, you may not have evidence of the offence).
Arrest - (an allegation has been made whether by you or another and you are placing them under arrest for the purposes of an interview and they can be put in a holding cell, you may not have evidence of the offence).
I believe that 'Right to Arrest' should be modified so that it is completely legal to arrest a person under suspicion of an offence but you do not have full evidence to support it. Below is a possible change to the 'Right to Arrest' law.
Law enforcement officers may arrest any person who they reasonably believe has committed a criminal offence. There is no requirement for an arrested person to be imprisoned.
And below a concept 'Right to Charge' law.
Law enforcement officers may charge any person who has been proven without reasonable doubt and through solid evidence to have committed a criminal offence. There is no requirement for a person charged with an offence to be imprisoned.
Why should this change be made: As it currently stands, the right to arrest law is very unrealistic and I really hate to tell people they are being detained rather than 'arrested on suspicion of an offence'. So really most of the benefit from this law comes down to realism.
What is the aim of this change: It should create a more realistic and professional arrest procedure.
Additional Information: Charging an offender doesn't work exactly like said in this thread as we don't actually have a court system, look it up if you're interested in how it works (or join paralake crime agency xd).