Rule Suggestion (3.12 Mayoral Assassination)

[E-kitten4Grandpas]

Suggestion Topic: 3.12 Mayoral Assassination
Suggestion Description: Rule Clarity On Assassination Terms once the taxes have been raised over 15% then lowered to avoid assassination when people are on their way to City Hall.

Why should this be added?:
- I believe this should be added / clarified because what tends to happen is people will make their adverts to go an assassinate the mayor and begin getting ready / start driving towards City Hall to assassinate the mayor and the mayor lowers them to avoid assassination, I think that the lowering gap time between the raised to lowered taxes should still allow people the right to assassinate the mayor if it isn't already allowed.

What negatives could this have?:
- 1. The possibility to lower the taxes, might do more harm than good because of the 10% tax in between mayoral elections.

I believe mayors should be allowed to lower the taxes, but I feel like there's a really weird gray area that isn't covered when taxes have been high for so long and once people start adverting and the mayor lowers the taxes although they refused to prior and people get confused on whether they can assassinate the mayor or not during that slow tax lowering/raising time.

 

[Lucius Husky]

Suggestion Topic: 3.12 Mayoral Assassination
Suggestion Description: Rule Clarity On Assassination Terms once the taxes have been raised over 15% then lowered to avoid assassination when people are on their way to City Hall.

Why should this be added?:
- I believe this should be added / clarified because what tends to happen is people will make their adverts to go an assassinate the mayor and begin getting ready / start driving towards City Hall to assassinate the mayor and the mayor lowers them to avoid assassination, I think that the lowering gap time between the raised to lowered taxes should still allow people the right to assassinate the mayor if it isn't already allowed.

What negatives could this have?:
- 1. The possibility to lower the taxes, might do more harm than good because of the 10% tax in between mayoral elections.

I believe mayors should be allowed to lower the taxes, but I feel like there's a really weird gray area that isn't covered when taxes have been high for so long and once people start adverting and the mayor lowers the taxes although they refused to prior and people get confused on whether they can assassinate the mayor or not during that slow tax lowering/raising time.

The point of the ‘threatening’ adverts is to give the mayor a chance to lower the taxes, if he responds to these adverts and lowers them then goal achieved right?

If he keeps lowering and raising then he isnt following promises and you can kill him regardless.

 

[E-kitten4Grandpas]

The point of the ‘threatening’ adverts is to give the mayor a chance to lower the taxes, if he responds to these adverts and lowers them then goal achieved right?

If he keeps lowering and raising then he isnt following promises and you can kill him regardless.

Yeah that is true, I probably should've clarified cause I meant more when people have already made their first threat / plea for lowered taxes and have made their final one when things escalate.

Alrighty! Thank you for the clarification cause I see a lot of people including myself get confused on whether or not it's okay to assassinate the mayor if they keep raising and lowering the taxes to avoid assassination. C:

 

[Bnjemann]

If someone is just fluctuating the taxes you are still inclined to kill them.