- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 10
Suggestion Topic: 3.4 Putting your Life at Risk
Suggestion Description: Rule 3.4 needs to be restructured or removed. As it currently stands, it doesn't function as a clear rule at all. It reads more like a vague risk assessment than an enforceable guideline. Even when a situation presents minimal risk, players can still be banned, which makes the rule feel arbitrary.
Right now, the rule is too ambiguous and open to interpretation, effectively turning enforcement into a matter of luck—dependent on which admin handles the case and how they personally assess the "risk."
Why should this be added?:
For example, under the current wording, a moderator could reasonably justify banning someone for simply entering the forest with no clear reason. Since the forest is considered a "mug zone," just being there without a specific goal could be seen as taking an unnecessary risk, and thus a violation of Rule 3.4 even if the player did nothing wrong.
What negatives could this have?:
This kind of uncertainty is unfair to players and puts too much subjective power in the hands of staff. The rule either needs to be clearly defined with specific, objective criteria or removed entirely.
