We all know tasers are soon going to be a thing, however not everyone knows how they may work, nor do I, so lets discuss.
I hope it works similarly to a nightstick hit. IMO the effects of being hit by a taser should be:
I think the taser should be limited to senior officers and above.
It should be a single shot weapon, and must be reloaded after being fired.
It should have a range of maybe five meters.
Here are two scenarios, with and without taser.
Without Taser:
Some nob gets pulled over by a lone officer. He is unco-operative. He gets out of the vehicle and decides he has too much to lose. He pulls a firearm on the officer, the officer retrieves his, they start firing, and whoever has the best aim wins. Realistic? I think not.
With Taser:
Some nob gets pulled over by a lone officer. He is unco-operative. He gets out of the vehicle and decides he has too much to lose. He pulls a firearm on the officer, the officer pulls out his taser and hits him with 5,000 volts to the bollocks, gun drops, officer is hopefully uninjured, and uses the time to restrain the individual with handcuffs. Realistic, more so.
Some people may say: "OI M8, THAT'S FUCKEN OP YEAH!" I would reply with: "It will stop retards from drawing weapons on officers at point blank range, which is incredibly unrealistic."
At the moment, you get people drawing weapons on officers point blank, which usually results in a point blank shootout in which someone wins, and then quickly bleed to death, or bandage themselves and limp away. Having the taser will probably reduce the amount of stupid point blank firefights like this.
If anyone has any constructive ideas, leave them below.
I hope it works similarly to a nightstick hit. IMO the effects of being hit by a taser should be:
- Extremely slowed movement.
- Dropping any weapons you have in your hands upon being tased.
- Unable to attack.
- Drained stamina
I think the taser should be limited to senior officers and above.
It should be a single shot weapon, and must be reloaded after being fired.
It should have a range of maybe five meters.
Here are two scenarios, with and without taser.
Without Taser:
Some nob gets pulled over by a lone officer. He is unco-operative. He gets out of the vehicle and decides he has too much to lose. He pulls a firearm on the officer, the officer retrieves his, they start firing, and whoever has the best aim wins. Realistic? I think not.
With Taser:
Some nob gets pulled over by a lone officer. He is unco-operative. He gets out of the vehicle and decides he has too much to lose. He pulls a firearm on the officer, the officer pulls out his taser and hits him with 5,000 volts to the bollocks, gun drops, officer is hopefully uninjured, and uses the time to restrain the individual with handcuffs. Realistic, more so.
Some people may say: "OI M8, THAT'S FUCKEN OP YEAH!" I would reply with: "It will stop retards from drawing weapons on officers at point blank range, which is incredibly unrealistic."
At the moment, you get people drawing weapons on officers point blank, which usually results in a point blank shootout in which someone wins, and then quickly bleed to death, or bandage themselves and limp away. Having the taser will probably reduce the amount of stupid point blank firefights like this.
If anyone has any constructive ideas, leave them below.