- Messages
- 237
- Reaction score
- 264
- Points
- 340
Your Steam/In-game Name: Jerry Clarkson
His/Her Steam/In-game Name: censored.exe, -.-brad-.- (not known).
His/Her SteamID:
Why Should This Player Be Punished: 2.1, 3.3, 3.29.
Player shot myself from his apartment building for stealing his car. While not in itself not a violation of any rules, the events leading up to my death were a clear violation of rule 3.3. and 3.29.
My reasoning to why I believe he had broken rule 2.1, is that by phygunning his wooden fence out of the way would had taken a rather long time in a realistic environment as he would had to use a vast range of tools to remove said object from the windowsill such as a hammer or crowbar to pry off the nails embedded within a wall.
My second reasoning to why rule 3.3 was broken being realistic actions is that he had no idea how it could had been myself who was breaking into his vehicle. This can be seen by the video of how whoever took the fence off the window originally hesitated for a few seconds before shooting myself. There was no way on the face of the earth in a realistic circumstance that I could had been identified as A, I was not wielding the crowbar I was using to gain entry to his Skyline and B, due to the age of Half-Life 2, the props did not feature visible lines between the wooden boards of the fence therefore visually I wouldn't had been recognised.
Furthermore, it should also be noted that during the ingame time of the incident was recorded to be at night, and it is well known that during these times, it gets darker due to the Earth's rotation. This too would be an element of me not being recognised as the vehicle would-be thief.
Therefore, my last reasoning for 3.29 recognising players being violated can also be applied to the above reason.
I asked if they knew how it was me who did it, yet they refused by saying "we saw you by our car".
Relating to this statement provided in real life, my dad's van was broken into by an unknown assailant, of whom I did not recognise due to it being dark, i.e night time for those confused by that statement. At the time after the break-in, a woman was walking her dog across the road. If this was PERPheads, does this give me reason to shoot the woman???
Evidence:
His/Her Steam/In-game Name: censored.exe, -.-brad-.- (not known).
His/Her SteamID:
Why Should This Player Be Punished: 2.1, 3.3, 3.29.
Player shot myself from his apartment building for stealing his car. While not in itself not a violation of any rules, the events leading up to my death were a clear violation of rule 3.3. and 3.29.
My reasoning to why I believe he had broken rule 2.1, is that by phygunning his wooden fence out of the way would had taken a rather long time in a realistic environment as he would had to use a vast range of tools to remove said object from the windowsill such as a hammer or crowbar to pry off the nails embedded within a wall.
My second reasoning to why rule 3.3 was broken being realistic actions is that he had no idea how it could had been myself who was breaking into his vehicle. This can be seen by the video of how whoever took the fence off the window originally hesitated for a few seconds before shooting myself. There was no way on the face of the earth in a realistic circumstance that I could had been identified as A, I was not wielding the crowbar I was using to gain entry to his Skyline and B, due to the age of Half-Life 2, the props did not feature visible lines between the wooden boards of the fence therefore visually I wouldn't had been recognised.
Furthermore, it should also be noted that during the ingame time of the incident was recorded to be at night, and it is well known that during these times, it gets darker due to the Earth's rotation. This too would be an element of me not being recognised as the vehicle would-be thief.
Therefore, my last reasoning for 3.29 recognising players being violated can also be applied to the above reason.
I asked if they knew how it was me who did it, yet they refused by saying "we saw you by our car".
Relating to this statement provided in real life, my dad's van was broken into by an unknown assailant, of whom I did not recognise due to it being dark, i.e night time for those confused by that statement. At the time after the break-in, a woman was walking her dog across the road. If this was PERPheads, does this give me reason to shoot the woman???
Evidence:
