Ban Bhopping

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
15
Reaction score
13
Points
195
Description of the idea: Put a direct mention of Bhopping into rule 3.3

What rule do you wish to Edit/Add:3.3
Your version of the rule: Include specific mention of Bunny Hopping as opposed to vague "unrealistic movement"
Why do you believe this rule should be Added/Edited: Never witnessed a man Bunny hop full speed into a firefight and accurately fire a long barrel rifle. This will probably upset the zoomers who like to spin round like a Beyblade and destroy people but hey ho worth a shout
 
Last edited:
Messages
1,983
Reaction score
4,523
Points
1,175
Location
United Kingdom
Thread moved to the correct section of the forums. Please update it with the rules discussion template as soon as possible.
 
Messages
6,905
Reaction score
17,947
Points
1,200
Location
North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
POV: You're just trying to kill some skids that threw a grenade and aren't equipped with any other weapons, pussying their way out

Can there also be a way to enforce this more strictly instead of just implementing a game feature that fucks up our recoil? (Raindance era). People need to be punished who do this and not just a slap on the wrist, gunplay can be horrible in this server.
 
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
1,482
Points
855
POV: You're just trying to kill some skids that threw a grenade and aren't equipped with any other weapons, pussying their way out

Can there also be a way to enforce this more strictly instead of just implementing a game feature that fucks up our recoil? (Raindance era). People need to be punished who do this and not just a slap on the wrist, gunplay can be horrible in this server.
good aim
 
Messages
1,986
Reaction score
3,878
Points
1,105
Location
Nottingham, England
I strongly disagree with removing something like this from the meta.

Bhopping through a door at a firefight is just us trusting that the opponents have the reactions of sloth. It puts you at a HUGE disadvantage for a short period of time, easily getting killed. It’s a risk and reward play and I don’t want firefights ending up as a standing behind two barricades firing.
 
Messages
505
Reaction score
1,930
Points
630
Location
Hung Chow residence.
I strongly disagree with removing something like this from the meta.

Bhopping through a door at a firefight is just us trusting that the opponents have the reactions of sloth. It puts you at a HUGE disadvantage for a short period of time, easily getting killed. It’s a risk and reward play and I don’t want firefights ending up as a standing behind two barricades firing.
Treating the game with a meta like it is an esport shouldn't really be on PERP; realistic movement was heavily enforced a while ago. Not sure why running and jumping has become the norm now.
 
Messages
15
Reaction score
13
Points
195
I strongly disagree with removing something like this from the meta.

Bhopping through a door at a firefight is just us trusting that the opponents have the reactions of sloth. It puts you at a HUGE disadvantage for a short period of time, easily getting killed. It’s a risk and reward play and I don’t want firefights ending up as a standing behind two barricades firing.
its a role play game not a twitch shooter zoomer
 
Messages
6,905
Reaction score
17,947
Points
1,200
Location
North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
I strongly disagree with removing something like this from the meta.

Bhopping through a door at a firefight is just us trusting that the opponents have the reactions of sloth. It puts you at a HUGE disadvantage for a short period of time, easily getting killed. It’s a risk and reward play and I don’t want firefights ending up as a standing behind two barricades firing.
CAa5q4T.png


we did it, we turned SeriousRP into an E-Sport
 
Messages
386
Reaction score
976
Points
500
Location
Behind you
I strongly disagree with removing something like this from the meta.

Bhopping through a door at a firefight is just us trusting that the opponents have the reactions of sloth. It puts you at a HUGE disadvantage for a short period of time, easily getting killed. It’s a risk and reward play and I don’t want firefights ending up as a standing behind two barricades firing.
You're right sprinting and crouch jumping through a doorway with a 3 foot rifle is certainly feasible
 
Messages
9,119
Reaction score
11,488
Points
935
Location
REHAB
I strongly disagree with removing something like this from the meta.

Bhopping through a door at a firefight is just us trusting that the opponents have the reactions of sloth. It puts you at a HUGE disadvantage for a short period of time, easily getting killed. It’s a risk and reward play and I don’t want firefights ending up as a standing behind two barricades firing.
There’s a difference between jumping through a Door and literal bhopping.
 
Messages
505
Reaction score
1,930
Points
630
Location
Hung Chow residence.
My opinion is that it should either not be a game mechanic or not be punishable. Most movement is instinctive anyway
But it is punishable, and therefor not allowed as a mechanic, the rules just need to be enforced properly or stated in black and white. Or we simply revert some changes that were made and make jumping a lot harder.
 
Messages
1,986
Reaction score
3,878
Points
1,105
Location
Nottingham, England
So Alt-sprint jumping through a doorway while holding a weapon in attack stance, is not literal bhopping, and is in fact, just "jumping through a door"
You’re disagreeing with the wrong part. The opinion is whether it should be allowed or not. @Creepis rightly says that implementing a mechanic will likely cause an unforeseen issue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top