Ban Bhopping

[Lockwood]

Description of the idea: Put a direct mention of Bhopping into rule 3.3

What rule do you wish to Edit/Add:3.3
Your version of the rule: Include specific mention of Bunny Hopping as opposed to vague "unrealistic movement"
Why do you believe this rule should be Added/Edited: Never witnessed a man Bunny hop full speed into a firefight and accurately fire a long barrel rifle. This will probably upset the zoomers who like to spin round like a Beyblade and destroy people but hey ho worth a shout

 

[Hayden]

Thread moved to the correct section of the forums. Please update it with the rules discussion template as soon as possible.

 

[Creepis]

POV: You're just trying to kill some skids that threw a grenade and aren't equipped with any other weapons, pussying their way out

Can there also be a way to enforce this more strictly instead of just implementing a game feature that fucks up our recoil? (Raindance era). People need to be punished who do this and not just a slap on the wrist, gunplay can be horrible in this server.

 

[Deleted member 8203]

POV: You're just trying to kill some skids that threw a grenade and aren't equipped with any other weapons, pussying their way out

Can there also be a way to enforce this more strictly instead of just implementing a game feature that fucks up our recoil? (Raindance era). People need to be punished who do this and not just a slap on the wrist, gunplay can be horrible in this server.

good aim

 

[Creepis]

good aim

g36c trash you mean

 

[joey]

I strongly disagree with removing something like this from the meta.

Bhopping through a door at a firefight is just us trusting that the opponents have the reactions of sloth. It puts you at a HUGE disadvantage for a short period of time, easily getting killed. It’s a risk and reward play and I don’t want firefights ending up as a standing behind two barricades firing.

 

[Standish]

I strongly disagree with removing something like this from the meta.

Bhopping through a door at a firefight is just us trusting that the opponents have the reactions of sloth. It puts you at a HUGE disadvantage for a short period of time, easily getting killed. It’s a risk and reward play and I don’t want firefights ending up as a standing behind two barricades firing.

Treating the game with a meta like it is an esport shouldn't really be on PERP; realistic movement was heavily enforced a while ago. Not sure why running and jumping has become the norm now.

 

[Lockwood]

I strongly disagree with removing something like this from the meta.

Bhopping through a door at a firefight is just us trusting that the opponents have the reactions of sloth. It puts you at a HUGE disadvantage for a short period of time, easily getting killed. It’s a risk and reward play and I don’t want firefights ending up as a standing behind two barricades firing.

its a role play game not a twitch shooter zoomer

 

[Creepis]

I strongly disagree with removing something like this from the meta.

Bhopping through a door at a firefight is just us trusting that the opponents have the reactions of sloth. It puts you at a HUGE disadvantage for a short period of time, easily getting killed. It’s a risk and reward play and I don’t want firefights ending up as a standing behind two barricades firing.

we did it, we turned SeriousRP into an E-Sport

 

[EVIL]

I strongly disagree with removing something like this from the meta.

Bhopping through a door at a firefight is just us trusting that the opponents have the reactions of sloth. It puts you at a HUGE disadvantage for a short period of time, easily getting killed. It’s a risk and reward play and I don’t want firefights ending up as a standing behind two barricades firing.

You're right sprinting and crouch jumping through a doorway with a 3 foot rifle is certainly feasible

 

[Buddy]

You're right sprinting and crouch jumping through a doorway with a 3 foot rifle is certainly feasible

yeah your right evil

 

[joey]

You're right sprinting and crouch jumping through a doorway with a 3 foot rifle is certainly feasible

Never said it was tbf

 

[Bnjemann]

I strongly disagree with removing something like this from the meta.

Bhopping through a door at a firefight is just us trusting that the opponents have the reactions of sloth. It puts you at a HUGE disadvantage for a short period of time, easily getting killed. It’s a risk and reward play and I don’t want firefights ending up as a standing behind two barricades firing.

There’s a difference between jumping through a Door and literal bhopping.

 

[Aquaa]

Never said it was tbf

the meta

 

[joey]

There’s a difference between jumping through a Door and literal bhopping.

My opinion is that it should either not be a game mechanic or not be punishable. Most movement is instinctive anyway

 

[Standish]

My opinion is that it should either not be a game mechanic or not be punishable. Most movement is instinctive anyway

But it is punishable, and therefor not allowed as a mechanic, the rules just need to be enforced properly or stated in black and white. Or we simply revert some changes that were made and make jumping a lot harder.

 

[EVIL]

Never said it was tbf

"Bhopping through a door at a firefight is just us trusting that the opponents have the reactions of sloth" so this isn't you saying that it is feasible?

 

[EVIL]

But it is punishable, and therefor not an allowed mechanic

So Alt-sprint jumping through a doorway while holding a weapon in attack stance, is not literal bhopping, and is in fact, just "jumping through a door"

 

[joey]

But it is punishable, and therefor not an allowed mechanic

Again, I’m giving my opinion on what I think it should be uno. Either not a functional mechanic or not punishable

 

[joey]

So Alt-sprint jumping through a doorway while holding a weapon in attack stance, is not literal bhopping, and is in fact, just "jumping through a door"

You’re disagreeing with the wrong part. The opinion is whether it should be allowed or not. @Creepis rightly says that implementing a mechanic will likely cause an unforeseen issue.