Punishment Type: Ban
Appeal Type: Dispute
Which staff member issued the punishment?: TinySlayer
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: 1 Year
Your Steam Name: Sorle
Your Roleplay Name: Alfa Ross
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:51990442
Why were you banned/blacklisted?: 1.4, 3.2 - Failure to act honestly when questioned about a situation. Communication using third party applications.
Why should this appeal be considered?: i cba puttiing effort into arguing this anymore so i'm just going to list to you why the 3.2 section of my ban is an absolute joke
this is what i admitted to
we made an informal agreement out of character on what we were going to do and then carried it out in-character but then i got mugged - AS SHOWN BY THE VIDEO OF WHAT HAPPENED
NOTHING HERE IS UNNATURAL - EVERY BASE IS COVERED IN CHARACTER, WE MADE CONTACT IN CHARACTER, AGREED ON EVERYTHING IN CHARACTER, AND DIRECTLY FOLLOWED THIS IMPLEMENTATION INTO THE RULES IN 3.31 TRANSACTIONS:
Agreements to perform a transaction may be made on external websites such as “The Internet” section of the forums, but the full transaction must take place in-character and follow the in-character rules.
if necessary i can show the entire forum conversation detailing what i admitted to therefore showing the only evidence they had of me "metagaming" being disgustingly false
raw demo https://mega.nz/file/JnYSVTDQ#NoHt7N8_rGDVu6fH6CX49qJpr97JyBFQSnezVGICoyA
Additional Information: i followed the rule exactly as it's listed man its so much effort to keep arguing at this stage i've just been falsely banned
the 1.4 section of the ban is also false as it was issued for "time wasted" - however wasn't the only time waste in this scenario placing a false ban in the first place? this whole thing is avoided if i'm not falsely banned initially so realistically the investigating staff just wasted their own time
Appeal Type: Dispute
Which staff member issued the punishment?: TinySlayer
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: 1 Year
Your Steam Name: Sorle
Your Roleplay Name: Alfa Ross
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:51990442
Why were you banned/blacklisted?: 1.4, 3.2 - Failure to act honestly when questioned about a situation. Communication using third party applications.
Why should this appeal be considered?: i cba puttiing effort into arguing this anymore so i'm just going to list to you why the 3.2 section of my ban is an absolute joke
this is what i admitted to
we made an informal agreement out of character on what we were going to do and then carried it out in-character but then i got mugged - AS SHOWN BY THE VIDEO OF WHAT HAPPENED
NOTHING HERE IS UNNATURAL - EVERY BASE IS COVERED IN CHARACTER, WE MADE CONTACT IN CHARACTER, AGREED ON EVERYTHING IN CHARACTER, AND DIRECTLY FOLLOWED THIS IMPLEMENTATION INTO THE RULES IN 3.31 TRANSACTIONS:
Agreements to perform a transaction may be made on external websites such as “The Internet” section of the forums, but the full transaction must take place in-character and follow the in-character rules.
if necessary i can show the entire forum conversation detailing what i admitted to therefore showing the only evidence they had of me "metagaming" being disgustingly false
raw demo https://mega.nz/file/JnYSVTDQ#NoHt7N8_rGDVu6fH6CX49qJpr97JyBFQSnezVGICoyA
Additional Information: i followed the rule exactly as it's listed man its so much effort to keep arguing at this stage i've just been falsely banned
the 1.4 section of the ban is also false as it was issued for "time wasted" - however wasn't the only time waste in this scenario placing a false ban in the first place? this whole thing is avoided if i'm not falsely banned initially so realistically the investigating staff just wasted their own time
Last edited:
