Deleted member 1235
Guest
So basically, I've just had my uni work marked by possibly the most triggered tutor in the country.
My work was a source analysis on a memorandum in 1916 telling French officers to instruct their men to stop fraternising with the Black American Soldiers, so as not to offend the white soldiers.
Anyway, I got a 2:1 and could've easily got a 1st but apparently my work was itself racist (whilst analysing a racist document, the irony right?). I'm curious to know if you were marking this work, would you have marked it down for using 'racist vocabulary'? Bare in mind, I had already used the word African American a million times before, and wanted to avoid repetition.
I'll post the full sentence to give it some context and allow you guys to judge for yourself
and
Bare in mind I've been doing 'source analysis' for nearly 10 years and have never had issues with how I referred to minority groups, even in the 4 years I did Fascism.
My work was a source analysis on a memorandum in 1916 telling French officers to instruct their men to stop fraternising with the Black American Soldiers, so as not to offend the white soldiers.
Anyway, I got a 2:1 and could've easily got a 1st but apparently my work was itself racist (whilst analysing a racist document, the irony right?). I'm curious to know if you were marking this work, would you have marked it down for using 'racist vocabulary'? Bare in mind, I had already used the word African American a million times before, and wanted to avoid repetition.
I'll post the full sentence to give it some context and allow you guys to judge for yourself

and

Bare in mind I've been doing 'source analysis' for nearly 10 years and have never had issues with how I referred to minority groups, even in the 4 years I did Fascism.