I believe in the "gateway drug" theory that weed is associated and I can apply this theory to several cases of individuals who I know (and knew) had moved onto bigger things in the drug market.
One is knew because now he has extreme paranoia, BPD and schizophrenia due to high levels of drug usage since the age of 16, starting with weed of many calibres of strengths.
This old friend of mine I had known since the age of three was a bright man was a big future ahead of him in the field of IT with uni all lined up for him to essentially throw it all away by the age of seventeen due to him being arrested for possession of Class B I think.
Furthermore, he was also charged for driving under the influence of a restricted substance at the age of nineteen but found not guilty. He had taken some dodgy pill from the dark web on a night out and unknowingly smacked his head. Obvious to all this, he fell unconscious at the wheel and binned his car into a bush.
I stand by my statement that with the application of the "gateway drug theory", the theory is correct. For this reason alone, this is why I deplore the usage of this smelly unpleasant drug for recreational or substance abuse usage but would rather push towards a more controlled usuage in a medical field where the usuage actually has benefit towards people who are suffering, not those hoping to stink up the place and listen to reagge.
en.m.wikipedia.org
By the way, referring the drug as "non-addictive" (
@Bert) is incorrect as addiction is usually formed by the body's release of dopamine (the good feeling chemical). Chocolate is also "chemically non-addictive" as is wanking and videogames, yet we see countless articles and studies on addiction associated to these acts.
How come we get those fucking retard spaces out dudes who insist everyone should smoke it and its safe when they're wearing shorts in the middle of winter, not washed for days and have shit hair...