And that has NOTHING to do with transparency. You claiming that it is and then making people who read your post think it is is more than intelectually dishonest. Please refrain from doing that in the future.
I already answered why staff might not always answer your questions so just reread my reply to that.
No it's not. Especially not when you go and make a beefy post like this and then go around claiming it's constructive criticism instead of drama.
So your entire evidence that there's bad behaviour going on is someone receiving a WARNING? Please give me a break...
I think Chris' response sums that up pretty well.
You DO have to provide proof for me to take your post seriously. Otherwise I'm just going to disregard it as the beefy drama post it clearly turned out to be.