I'd rather have someone who's been involved in politics other than Someone who's had their companies bankrupt several times and doesn't know how to lead it lol
![[DPA] Ted™](/data/avatars/m/5/5812.jpg?1476881789){kind=avatar}
Alex
Guest
- Thread starter
- #25
I have a feeling if Hilary wins, ww3 will start, if trump wins ww3 will start, sooo, lets hope none of those two wins? ;D
I could sit here and argue for hours saying how if I have any of your a million dollars I'd like to see you turn it into a company with billions in assets still going strong. Or that most new businesses fail (http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericwag...ons-8-out-of-10-businesses-fail/#28ea7d925e3c). Maybe I'll go with the fact that one of the candidates consistently lied to the American public about public policy and issues and even lied to our Congrèss. Or how about how one of them, as a lawyer, represented a rapist and got him off charges (completely okay that is her civil duty) but then laughed about it on tape calling he young girl who had been raped (http://www.factcheck.org/2016/06/clintons-1975-rape-case/). Or how that person has made millions of dollars from simply being a politician. Or who's charity is recieves donations that just about no one can deny lead to political preference.
Or how the candidate who you all hate for not having political experience or for bankrupting businesses actually completed a government project early on in his career for 3 million dollars in 6 months after the government LITERALLY took 6 years and 13 million dollars and then started from scratch again (https://www.google.com/amp/www.forb...n-rinking-of-american-politics/?client=safari). Or maybe how the same candidate has been actively involved in politics for years, often crossing party lines. And don't even mention him getting out of taxes, the candidate was smart. they didn't write the tax codes they just used them to the best of their ability. Their opponent actually created them. And any money the corporation saved would go back into the business mostly. That's the golden rule, reinvest. And don't say they will cause WWIII with Russia. Because Russia actually likes this candidate and they can get along, the other will be way more aggressive I can promise you.
Both candidates are idiots. Both have said stupid things. Both have had experience working with government. Both are well respected for their time. I am willing to give up certain normalités and safeties to remain as free as I am today, with less federal oversight and restrictions on my profession or life. I know with one candidate I will remain more free and the other I will fall into the same socialistic pit I see half of Europe being swallowed into.
Or how the candidate who you all hate for not having political experience or for bankrupting businesses actually completed a government project early on in his career for 3 million dollars in 6 months after the government LITERALLY took 6 years and 13 million dollars and then started from scratch again (https://www.google.com/amp/www.forb...n-rinking-of-american-politics/?client=safari). Or maybe how the same candidate has been actively involved in politics for years, often crossing party lines. And don't even mention him getting out of taxes, the candidate was smart. they didn't write the tax codes they just used them to the best of their ability. Their opponent actually created them. And any money the corporation saved would go back into the business mostly. That's the golden rule, reinvest. And don't say they will cause WWIII with Russia. Because Russia actually likes this candidate and they can get along, the other will be way more aggressive I can promise you.
Both candidates are idiots. Both have said stupid things. Both have had experience working with government. Both are well respected for their time. I am willing to give up certain normalités and safeties to remain as free as I am today, with less federal oversight and restrictions on my profession or life. I know with one candidate I will remain more free and the other I will fall into the same socialistic pit I see half of Europe being swallowed into.
That's not what she said at all, you've clearly just heard your friends or Someone else talk shit about her.
- Messages
- 639
- Reaction score
- 908
- Points
- 645
God knows what I've heard
With the election of Hillary nothing much will change. She has been in politics for most of her life and definitely has the most experience out of anyone which makes her both the most qualified person and the least qualified person. Being in the established part of politics certainly is a big turn-off for lots of people leaning middle to middle-right. Having been up against Bernie Sanders has definitely tanked her popularity ratings considering the Democratic primaries uncovered a less desirable side of Hillary which is easily seen as untrustworthy and with the revelation of the emails which some people want her to go to jail for on both sides.
Trump on the other hand is more popular due to the fact that he is an outlier, a non-establishment candidate who is perceived to be an excellent businessman. However, being the strongman that he is, he is often calling for breach of basic rights, such as the first amendment, claiming that muslims should be barred from entering the country, making what is defining free speech more limited. Not to mention the fact that some of the policies Trump are similar to the tendencies of Nazi Germany. He is also a massive pervert and is just tasteless in general when it comes to things he has said about minorities and how it quite clear how he views women. Not to mention he is not actually worth as much as he says he is. He feels he is worth billions so it must be true.
tl;dr: Both candidates are dreadful and doesn't have any interest in serving the American people, but instead are only going to use their position to further their own interests. However one candidate will still be better than the other, and it's obviously Clinton.
Trump on the other hand is more popular due to the fact that he is an outlier, a non-establishment candidate who is perceived to be an excellent businessman. However, being the strongman that he is, he is often calling for breach of basic rights, such as the first amendment, claiming that muslims should be barred from entering the country, making what is defining free speech more limited. Not to mention the fact that some of the policies Trump are similar to the tendencies of Nazi Germany. He is also a massive pervert and is just tasteless in general when it comes to things he has said about minorities and how it quite clear how he views women. Not to mention he is not actually worth as much as he says he is. He feels he is worth billions so it must be true.
Smart of him yes, but do remind me who the burden then falls on to pay for public services, the military, schools, roads etc etc falls on.
They only like him because he is also in favor of strong-arming political opponents into submission and how he is going to use the office for his own benefit and the benefit of the elite.
Throwing around the word socialist when you really have no idea of the policies that are being done in Europe, nice. Did you know that healthcare, schools, roads and even the military are also socialist programs? of course you didn't.
You are hardly free if the government can violate your rights at their own whim. If you don't think they won't do it to you as well, you're wrong.
tl;dr: Both candidates are dreadful and doesn't have any interest in serving the American people, but instead are only going to use their position to further their own interests. However one candidate will still be better than the other, and it's obviously Clinton.
Last edited:
I never liked the idea of either of them, but what we need is to find the least worst choice, which unfortunately to say, is Trump. Trump is an amazing businessman, and despite him being a racist he is still better than Clinton. Clinton supported the Iraq war after 9/11, want this no fly zone shit, which will cause Russia, a country with more weapons and nukes than America, to go to war with America.
Onto all these Trump rape allegations, these are most likely fake, as they are only coming out now, and these cases are not being taken to court as they know these claims are false, and simply slander. Clintons whole campaign is based on manys hatred for trump.
As far as Clinton defending a child rapist, she was a lawyer, she had to defend her defendant, as far as laughing at the rape victim, that's a different story, there is many ways you can take this out of context, but by what I heard, I think it is disgusting and not what America should have as a president.
Trump is a complete and utter moron but the better of the two in my opinion.
Onto all these Trump rape allegations, these are most likely fake, as they are only coming out now, and these cases are not being taken to court as they know these claims are false, and simply slander. Clintons whole campaign is based on manys hatred for trump.
As far as Clinton defending a child rapist, she was a lawyer, she had to defend her defendant, as far as laughing at the rape victim, that's a different story, there is many ways you can take this out of context, but by what I heard, I think it is disgusting and not what America should have as a president.
Trump is a complete and utter moron but the better of the two in my opinion.
Clinton wants to make Israel a no-fly zone. By her doing this she would be starting war with that country and that can/will piss RUSSIA off. WW3 Is not that close if she gets elected.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...linton-ww3-world-war-three-start-donald-trump
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...linton-ww3-world-war-three-start-donald-trump
![[NL]DingaDongo](/data/avatars/s/4/4628.jpg?1453141968){kind=avatar}
