Ban Request 3.18
- Thread starter Nots_Of_Nova
- Start date
- Status
@Nots_Of_Nova you broke 3.26 by doing more than one action in one /me just saying 
.
How ever he did not break 3.18 ( if he did not store anything ) for going into the storage but if he did store anything he did.
He also broke 3.26 by not following the /me's you did.
I will give this a +Support for 3.26 and maybe for 3.18 if things get a bit more clearer.
. How ever he did not break 3.18 ( if he did not store anything ) for going into the storage but if he did store anything he did.
He also broke 3.26 by not following the /me's you did.
I will give this a +Support for 3.26 and maybe for 3.18 if things get a bit more clearer.
The two sweatervests could also be warned for breaking 3.24 when they began exclaiming "metagaming" at you.
Unless there is provided proof (i.e. logs from admin, or video from Eddie displaying whether he stored something or not), the 3.18 is completely valid. 3.26 on yourself for doing 2 actions in one /me may be considered, and 3.26 on Eddie for ignoring your /me's and accessing storage despite being tied.
Neutral
Unless there is provided proof (i.e. logs from admin, or video from Eddie displaying whether he stored something or not), the 3.18 is completely valid. 3.26 on yourself for doing 2 actions in one /me may be considered, and 3.26 on Eddie for ignoring your /me's and accessing storage despite being tied.
Neutral
-support You left the raid to deal with me, and there is no evidence that he actually put anything in/took anything out. Also unrelated note, theres a /report function for a reason. When staff are on, use it. And find out who the people are. Dont just post "dont know". It looks like you dont really care about these brs.
- Thread starter
- #5
If I don't care than why am I doing all this work to getting people banned, wouldn't just doing /report be easy and faster? And it takes about 40 min. each for videos to be uploaded.
- Status
