You’re missing the point he made entirely, the construction booklet allowed there to be no confusion. Can’t wait for people to start disputing bans and warnings because Staff A and Staff B have two different opinions on what is and isn’t allowed. Bring back the booklet and allow more things would be the best choice
does that mean that whenever they can fuck up the swat van the pd update is out
You're failing to take into account the fact that risking an M82 is 75k, but each nade is 4k. An M82 is risking considerably more, and realistically an M82 is an anti-materiel rifle, so the main purpose of it is actually supposed to be destroying shit like the SWAT van rather than shooting people lol.
Please do not bring logic into this.
A optimal solution would be that only the engine of the van can be shot to disable it, and that it woudn't kill the TFU members inside but instead render it immobile/useless.
Yes because nothing is better than a TFU collecting info and going: Not even 3.4 mate. You can't kill me. whilst you try gunpointing him out.
My thoughts exactly, then the TFU inside would be rendered useless if accounted for properly, but still allowing an even playing field and an opportunity for the TFU members to escape.
You must be pretty special if you can't manage to hit an immobilized van the size of a mini truck with a frag if the TFU member decides to stay inside. Then again if you actually manage to surround the van with multiple people it simply shows the imblalance between leo's and crims.
Keep in mind that even immobilized players can still grenade it to kill the members inside.
Martino was banned for more reasons that displayed and you out of everyone would this . Nade was like myself in the fact he did something bad but not to the malicious extend of what David and Martino decided to do so the only difference between me and him was the fact I decided to speak to @Samuel and @Garret_Pp in teamspeak, apologize and explain to them my intentions if I was allowed back. Nade decided not to appeal (until earlier today) and therefore fell under the fact that:
He was banned about 4 months ago the same as me thus making him not meet requirements. If you want to argue "staff discretion" and bias I wouldn't pull up names such as Youseff & Martino to prove a point, just a tip
At one stage you fit that criteria didn't you? not to keep bringing it up but you made 2 massive fuck ups, came back and made an awesome impact on the community. I get not unbanning people such as Feng as it was consistent but fucking Nade? come on, the kid has nothing bad about him except his shit hairline, the kid is harmless. Not going to get anywhere with weak ass mentalities and holding grudges for half a year.
Back in 2015 staff would enforce some defences and would move them if they were to aids. That shit is overkill. Lewis is just trying to prove a point so when he brings it back he will say "I told you so"
https://bans.perpheads.com/?search=STEAM_0:0:35126079
You out of all people should not be arguing out of who should be unbanned and who shouldn't, you went ahead and had a massive RDM fest with friends even knowing you did it, you even got a moderator demoted on the run. (I know you mentioned it but seriously)not that I care that much about nade but...
https://bans.perpheads.com/?search=STEAM_0:0:35126079
https://bans.perpheads.com/warnings?page=3&search=STEAM_0:0:35126079
seems like a pretty serious guy to me who has 14 bans and 19 warnings, compared to nade who has a better record than said person.
lets not forget it is undeniable that the guy was a massive minge even while staff
(sitting on a fucking sofa in the middle of a raid)
https://plays.tv/video/59b6a8183dec...d-up-sofa-with-2-ppl-on-unrealisitic-actions-
now prove to me that nade is worse than him
but who am i to talk since i did the same right ?
