- Messages
- 467
- Reaction score
- 425
- Points
- 490
Something bad enough happening inside the PD that pushed you to the point to resign, assuming it was by someone with powerWhat?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Something bad enough happening inside the PD that pushed you to the point to resign, assuming it was by someone with powerWhat?
This is why we need dumb rating backAcerius proving even further my point
This guy proving my point that it should be a community vote since someone with apparent power cant be trusted?
It was someone outside of the normal chain of command, so while I appreciate the sentiment behind your point, it doesn't correlate with what I was saying.Something bad enough happening inside the PD that pushed you to the point to resign, assuming it was by someone with power
Perhaps more questions should be asked. Or a private apology from the concerned party would suffice.As for a better topic of conversation, I'm struggling to really think who on earth could be better than @Acerius when it comes to running the PD - It's a sad shame that he felt he needed to resign, perhaps more questions should be asked as to why someone so dedicated, believed resigning from a role he loved was so necessary. We're missing out on probably one of the best-equipped people for the job, let's hope any future candiates don't turn out to be an errant shit guzzler, which I am aware is likely.
We can dig up the old Slayerduck stuff if you can't remember why PD was fucked a few years ago, letting the community have somewhat of a say in how their PD is run could help prevent issuesSorry if I am missing the point here, but why on earth does it matter if someone is a high rank in the PD and also a staff member as long as they can provably do both at the same time?
People seem to act like there is some r/conspiracy going on, where staff members or those already in some degree of power can be the only ones to hold a decent rank in the PD. Have you not thought that the people who get accepted for and involved in server staff positions might have a little more experience managing people, performing administrative tasks and have a general higher standard of roleplay?
As for a better topic of conversation, I'm struggling to really think who on earth could be better than @Acerius when it comes to running the PD - It's a sad shame that he felt he needed to resign, perhaps more questions should be asked as to why someone so dedicated, believed resigning from a role he loved was so necessary. We're missing out on probably one of the best-equipped people for the job, let's hope any future candiates don't turn out to be an errant shit guzzler, which I am aware is likely.
Also on behalf of everyone reading, shut the fuck up @Inchs
Bro. You need to let this go.We can dig up the old Slayerduck stuff if you can't remember why PD was fucked a few years ago, letting the community have somewhat of a say in how their PD is run could help prevent issues
I've let it go, I'm just trying to say a point that when the staff and PD team starts to heavily mix it can get difficult to manage and that it should just be made as public as possible with community input. Sure the chance of a minge pick being voted highly is possible, but then it'd be easy to step in and just not follow through.Bro. You need to let this go.
Because a high % of the people who vote don't have a rank above officer within the PD or regularly RP as an officer. The staff team have NO SAYING in who gets any ranks within the PD, especially not the Chief ranks.I've let it go, I'm just trying to say a point that when the staff and PD team starts to heavily mix it can get difficult to manage and that it should just be made as public as possible with community input. Sure the chance of a minge pick being voted highly is possible, but then it'd be easy to step in and just not follow through.
I don't understand why people are so afraid to let the community in a bit on the process if there is nothing to hide?
Collier stated in a post above that'd it'd be senior members who would get to decide, not sure if he meant staff, PD or perhaps both.Because a high % of the people who vote don't have a rank above officer within the PD or regularly RP as an officer. The staff team have NO SAYING in who gets any ranks within the PD, especially not the Chief ranks.
The community won't get any input on how the PD is run just because the Chief is decided by a popularity contest. It is up to the next Chief to sufficiently engage with the wants of the community once they are chosen.I've let it go, I'm just trying to say a point that when the staff and PD team starts to heavily mix it can get difficult to manage and that it should just be made as public as possible with community input. Sure the chance of a minge pick being voted highly is possible, but then it'd be easy to step in and just not follow through.
I don't understand why people are so afraid to let the community in a bit on the process if there is nothing to hide?
He literally said the owners, the community managers and him.Collier stated in a post above that'd it'd be senior members who would get to decide, not sure if he meant staff, PD or perhaps both.
I say give @Thorgal or @walnash COD and be done with it. They seem like they will get the job doneThe community won't get any input on how the PD is run just because the Chief is decided by a popularity contest. It is up to the next Chief to sufficiently engage with the wants of the community once they are chosen.
If you're so afraid of the community vote put together the actual worthwhile applications and proceed on voting from there as a good middle ground, you get someone 'serious' and the community gets a say on what they want nextThe community won't get any input on how the PD is run just because the Chief is decided by a popularity contest. It is up to the next Chief to sufficiently engage with the wants of the community once they are chosen.
Hope everything goes well, gets sorted out and you reconsider coming back, you're pretty much the only CoD that was reliable more than anyone PERP has seen before and always took the role on to a much more higher standard than what was expected really.Perhaps more questions should be asked. Or a private apology from the concerned party would suffice.
Why would members of the community that's not a part of PLPD have a vote in something that doesn't affect them?If you're so afraid of the community vote put together the actual worthwhile applications and proceed on voting from there as a good middle ground, you get someone 'serious' and the community gets a say on what they want next
Anybody can become apart of the PD, the exam isn't hard, therefore the vote would then affect themWhy would members of the community that's not a part of PLPD have a vote in something that doesn't affect them?
If you wanted members of the PD that have the rank of senior officer and above, I understand. But if everyone vote for people then it's gonna be a popularity contest and timewaster for management when it turns out to be someone incompetent who doesn't know the different from law 9.2 ,9.5 or 9.6.
Who is gonna deem them "serious"? It's just another popularity contest and it's really not productive.Anybody can become apart of the PD, the exam isn't hard, therefore the vote would then affect them
Like I said to Collier, a compromise where a handful of applications are selected, all of people deemed 'serious' enough to hold the rank, then hold a vote from that.
The people who would have previously under Colliers suggested method have just straight up chosen someone.Who is gonna deem them "serious"? It's just another popularity contest and it's really not productive.