- Messages
- 162
- Reaction score
- 203
- Points
- 185
Your Steam/In-game Name: Topher/Tayshawwn Genius-Zamilion
His/Her Steam/In-game Name: Mango/Jay Rothwell and FatGeorge/George Wolff
His/Her SteamID: STEAM_0:1:119099254 (mango) STEAM_0:1:108264788 (fatgeorge)
Why Should This Player Be Punished:
Both of these players mugged me in the bazaar shops, taking me from the front of a store into the back. Their reasoning was that since I crossed the border from the main passage of the shops into one of the shopfronts (still a public place), I was a valid target. I have yet to see the actual logic behind this.
Rule 5.1 states that 'Muggings should only take place in locations which are out of the view of the public.' A shopfront is absolutely in view of the public, and since I was threatened with a gun in the shopfront, the mugging took place there and was then carried into the back of the shop.
I also have precedent on my side:
Let's take a look at a few sentences from this verdict back when ayjay was an admin (please tell me if this judgement has been overruled by another AR verdict):
1
'It's not and has never been acceptable to attempt to gunpoint someone in public, and then move them to a more public place to mug them.'
2
'even the alleyway[behind the bazaar] is a little dodgy (considering there's a fence).'
3
'Mugging does not give you a free pass to gunpoint people in public'
4
'you shouldn't move people about in order to reach a safer place, the place you initially chose to mug someone should be suitable enough for you not to do this.'
1 is a general sentence that applies to my situation and, in my opinion (irrelevant ik) already makes my argument valid
2 reflects that if the alleyway, which archetypally is a great place for a mugging is dodgy seeing as passing traffic can see you through it, then a shopping area is super fucking dodgy. anyone could come in at any time and witness the crime, including police officers.
3 is simple: if you could not easily get away with gunpointing someone somewhere without a considerable risk, mugging doesn't make it better. Pulling a gun on someone in a market is dumb because you could be spotted at any time and confronted by law enforcement or org members of the muggee(?).
4 is the big one: you CAN'T mug by moving someone into a private area from a public area. If you can't mug someone IN a shopfront, you can't START the mugging there. You should be able to finish the robbery in one place, hypothetically.
I'll close off this argument by saying that this is the situationally relevant judgement of an admin who is now a senior.
btw sorry guys, i'd only make the RR if i could.
Evidence (Demo Required):http://www.mediafire.com/file/tfb8sk4bj8z7aua/perpheads_demo_2018-9-15_22-46-17.dem/file
Tick: 32500
His/Her Steam/In-game Name: Mango/Jay Rothwell and FatGeorge/George Wolff
His/Her SteamID: STEAM_0:1:119099254 (mango) STEAM_0:1:108264788 (fatgeorge)
Why Should This Player Be Punished:
Both of these players mugged me in the bazaar shops, taking me from the front of a store into the back. Their reasoning was that since I crossed the border from the main passage of the shops into one of the shopfronts (still a public place), I was a valid target. I have yet to see the actual logic behind this.
Rule 5.1 states that 'Muggings should only take place in locations which are out of the view of the public.' A shopfront is absolutely in view of the public, and since I was threatened with a gun in the shopfront, the mugging took place there and was then carried into the back of the shop.
I also have precedent on my side:

Let's take a look at a few sentences from this verdict back when ayjay was an admin (please tell me if this judgement has been overruled by another AR verdict):
1
'It's not and has never been acceptable to attempt to gunpoint someone in public, and then move them to a more public place to mug them.'
2
'even the alleyway[behind the bazaar] is a little dodgy (considering there's a fence).'
3
'Mugging does not give you a free pass to gunpoint people in public'
4
'you shouldn't move people about in order to reach a safer place, the place you initially chose to mug someone should be suitable enough for you not to do this.'
1 is a general sentence that applies to my situation and, in my opinion (irrelevant ik) already makes my argument valid
2 reflects that if the alleyway, which archetypally is a great place for a mugging is dodgy seeing as passing traffic can see you through it, then a shopping area is super fucking dodgy. anyone could come in at any time and witness the crime, including police officers.
3 is simple: if you could not easily get away with gunpointing someone somewhere without a considerable risk, mugging doesn't make it better. Pulling a gun on someone in a market is dumb because you could be spotted at any time and confronted by law enforcement or org members of the muggee(?).
4 is the big one: you CAN'T mug by moving someone into a private area from a public area. If you can't mug someone IN a shopfront, you can't START the mugging there. You should be able to finish the robbery in one place, hypothetically.
I'll close off this argument by saying that this is the situationally relevant judgement of an admin who is now a senior.
btw sorry guys, i'd only make the RR if i could.
Evidence (Demo Required):http://www.mediafire.com/file/tfb8sk4bj8z7aua/perpheads_demo_2018-9-15_22-46-17.dem/file
Tick: 32500