- Messages
- 38
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
Hear me out:
It would be nice, in my opinion, if every 20 minutes or so there is a mayor vote (if someone currently is the mayor) between all of the people who put themselves into the ballot and the current mayor himself.
This would stop corrupt mayors from keeping their job with 50% taxes for hours by protecting themselves with the SWAT. This would mean mayors would have to work for the people's needs instead of to just piss off the people and start a witchhunt on himself (as commonly happens once people realise that being the mayor can be dead boring).
Scenario A:
Timothy Hitchens is the mayor. He is doing a good job and has managed to create a stable government with decent wages and lots of jobs. The tax is at 15% but nobody cares because the city is running so smoothly.
4 other people sign up for the mayor vote and in 20 minutes another vote happens. The city votes for Timothy Hitchens because they have enjoyed his rule and know that he works for the people.
Scenario B:
Ashton Killington is the mayor. He has the taxes at 50%, is hiding in Subs 4 with the SWAT protecting him and is constantly making broadcasts such as "/broadcast Due to terrorist attacks I am having to hide at Subs 4. Please do not come into Subs 4!" etc.
3 other people sign up for the mayor vote and in 20 minutes another vote happens. The city votes for someone else because Ashton Killington was an asshole.
Probably has some flaws and ways people could abuse it that could be tweaked. Comment away.
It would be nice, in my opinion, if every 20 minutes or so there is a mayor vote (if someone currently is the mayor) between all of the people who put themselves into the ballot and the current mayor himself.
This would stop corrupt mayors from keeping their job with 50% taxes for hours by protecting themselves with the SWAT. This would mean mayors would have to work for the people's needs instead of to just piss off the people and start a witchhunt on himself (as commonly happens once people realise that being the mayor can be dead boring).
Scenario A:
Timothy Hitchens is the mayor. He is doing a good job and has managed to create a stable government with decent wages and lots of jobs. The tax is at 15% but nobody cares because the city is running so smoothly.
4 other people sign up for the mayor vote and in 20 minutes another vote happens. The city votes for Timothy Hitchens because they have enjoyed his rule and know that he works for the people.
Scenario B:
Ashton Killington is the mayor. He has the taxes at 50%, is hiding in Subs 4 with the SWAT protecting him and is constantly making broadcasts such as "/broadcast Due to terrorist attacks I am having to hide at Subs 4. Please do not come into Subs 4!" etc.
3 other people sign up for the mayor vote and in 20 minutes another vote happens. The city votes for someone else because Ashton Killington was an asshole.
Probably has some flaws and ways people could abuse it that could be tweaked. Comment away.