Org wars in general.

[John Daymon]

What rule do you wish to Edit/Add: I guess adding a rule for org wars or changing 2.5 or something
Your version of the rule: ??.?? If an organisation is in war with another organisation it is completely fine for them to kill each other at any point of time till one of the parties give up, however a war has to have a meaning for it to actually be in place.
Why do you believe this rule should be Added/Edited: Because org wars now are lame as shit.

 

[Tinky]

No molotovs and carbombs tho

 

[Deleted member 4983]

Oh god, please yes. This would make me come back. It would make things interesting again.

 

[money]

Won't be lame as shit if you can KOS each other and KOS raid with no restrictions.
Too bad someone in an org would report that shit because they lost the shootout

 

[glacial]

No exceptions. (I had no gun, that 2.5)
Im sure everyone would love to kill someone they dont like for no reason.(only if their org is at war)
+Support

 

[John Daymon]

No exceptions. (I had no gun, that 2.5)
Im sure everyone would love to kill someone they dont like for no reason.(only if their org is at war)
+Support

I think it's something that people have to understand what an org war actually is, if you're in a war with another org of course you're gonna shoot each other as soon as you see them, people who go haha war time im gonna raid them 24/7 dont know wtf they're on

 

[Aquaa]

Makes me want a Blood/Crip org type thing, see some skid wearing the wrong color in your hood and you pop his ass LMAO

 

[Deleted member 4983]

Would you have to inform the enemy org that you left your old one if you pussy out?

 

[John Daymon]

Would you have to inform the enemy org that you left your old one if you pussy out?

I think its important for people who left to be left alone, if you pussy out because you can't stand it then you should be out of it completely

 

[Deleted member 4983]

I think it's something that people have to understand what an org war actually is, if you're in a war with another org of course you're gonna shoot each other as soon as you see them, people who go haha war time im gonna raid them 24/7 dont know wtf they're on

I think both sides should agree to the war though otherwise people will just go and declare war on everyone and mass rdm xd

 

[John Daymon]

I think both sides should agree to the war though otherwise people will just go and declare war on everyone and mass rdm xd

Obviously you'd have to agree on a war with each other, and I think it should also be regulated on how it should be accepted for staff members so that we can keep track of what is going on.

 

[McGlinchy]

yes please allow me to shoot @Sam and @JackHilton123 for memes

 

[Deleted member 4116]

We this +support this would incourage people to start shit like Bloods and Crips just like @Aquaa said.
This reminds me so much of LSRP times so you can do shit like this.

 

[Mage]

Make it so both have to agree somehow, either just a post or make use of the 'Organisations' section that was created on the forums and now is hardly in use...

and no u rarted people this wont mean literal mass rdm because other rules are still in place to stop people just shooting eachother in front of cops etc.


i'd be down to play if this shit would be allowed

 

[Deleted member 4983]

Obviously you'd have to agree on a war with each other, and I think it should also be regulated on how it should be accepted for staff members so that we can keep track of what is going on.

Alright, seems good, maybe an alliance system and enemy system? lmao.

Spoiler: xd

 

[Samジ]

Allow me to kos @Janice and @Aquaa pls thx

 

[.....]

Mandem gon be sending roadmen fam. Shanks and acid bruv init.

 

[Shokron]

2015 perpheads confirmed ?

 

[Samジ]

2015 perpheads confirmed ?

yes please

 

[Deleted member 6228]

I like this idea but it should be managed via the organisation page and official declarations of war