28/06/20 - Staff Meeting Notes

[Dom_]

28/06/2020 - Staff Meeting Notes​

Helper/Enforcer Changes

• Helper requirement for Enforcer removed
• If an Enforcer candidate has potential but isn't quite ready for the role, they may be given Helper and reviewed for a temporary period.
• Training for Enforcers will be improved.
• A section for staff will be added to the help page

Ban Lengths

• Players will not receive such long bans for minor rule breaks
• Players who consistently cause problems and do not learn will still receive lengthy bans.
• Bans for 3.20 will have more consistent lengths.

Bombing in raids

• The excessive amount of bombs used in raids will have a solution in the coming days/week.

Construction

• One way defenses, head glitches and pixel peeks will be enforced more strictly.

3.4 Enforcement

• Clarified that when being gun pointed and told not to move from behind you may not pull your gun even if it is in passive stance.

Withholding evidence

• Evidence that has been held for a long time period will not be admissible and evidence that is "dug up" or held maliciously can lead to punishment on the reporter.

 

[Creepis]

Bombing in raids

• The excessive amount of bombs used in raids will have a solution in the coming days/week.

May I point out this thread that had a discussion about this issue?

Limit on amount of bombs used in raids.

Description of the idea: Have a limit on amount of bombs used per raid. Why should this be added? (pros): at the moment bigger orgs are using 6+ bombs per raid below and above apartments so there is literally 0 way of countering it. It is extremely over kill and is impossible to counter it...

perpheads.com

 

[Kempotent]

Bombing in raids

• The excessive amount of bombs used in raids will have a solution in the coming days/week.

Lollis are not gonna be happy

 

[Dom_]

This was discussed and considered

 

[Dom_]

I don't think any of them are happy at the moment.

 

[ΙεΙίος1]

Players will not receive such long bans for minor rule breaks

I thought people were whining because bans weren't long enough.

 

[Kempotent]

i believe as in minor they mean running across intersection or prank calling

 

[Deleted member 1235]

​

Withholding evidence

• Evidence that has been held for a long time period will not be admissible and evidence that is "dug up" or held maliciously can lead to punishment on the reporter.

How long would be considered a long time?
If you have evidence of someone breaking rules from say 1-2 weeks ago but had a valid reason for not being able to upload it at the time would it still be permissible? Or if you were going through old videos and stumbled across rule breakages?

 

[Creepis]

GREAT

 

[ΙεΙίος1]

I don't recall seeing any bans for running across the intersection or prank calling.

 

[Bnjemann]

Bombing in raids

• The excessive amount of bombs used in raids will have a solution in the coming days/week.

Limit bombs to 2 per person I guess. Simple solution. This could result in "Zerg raids" Ending in overbombing.

 

[George]

Bombing in raids

• The excessive amount of bombs used in raids will have a solution in the coming days/week.

The problem was people bombing below apartments and killing people above them, not giving them a chance to defend. potentially make that a rule? idk.

 

[Mekls]

I imagine this is more to stop people who have the intent to take revenge on enemy organizations or make revenge AR's, the type of people who have "folders". And if you just stumbled across a rule breakage it probably isn't that serious.

 

[Husky]

Any updates on the bans that were just issued?

 

[Cole]

Releasing confidential staff information

 

[Husky]

Is this for both users ?

 

[jjjackier]

don't worry bro i broke these cuffs

 

[Nate]

Ban Lengths

• Players will not receive such long bans for minor rule breaks
• Players who consistently cause problems and do not learn will still receive lengthy bans.
• Bans for 3.20 will have more consistent lengths.

Good decision had to be done sometime.

 

[Cole]

@Husky No. Only for the (ex)staff member. The other one was 1.1

 

[George]

​

3.4 Enforcement

• Clarified that when being gun pointed and told not to move from behind you may not pull your gun even if it is in passive stance.

Could you not have your gun in attack stance?