28/06/20 - Staff Meeting Notes

[Madda]

@Husky I'll just leave what I put in slack here.

Regarding the gun pointing at drug dealer thing: During the full staff meeting we had, and the admin meeting that followed we decided if you were gun pointed from behind at the drug dealer, even with a gun in passive you should follow the muggers orders. The exception here is if there are multiple people at the DD with firearms in passive. For now we will allow people to turn around and fire if their gun is in attack stance while selling drugs. This will be discussed in the next admin meeting, and we'll update you as soon as something has been decided.

 

[joey]

@Madda wouldn’t it be the exact same timing and risk of death to turn around with a gun in passive stance, you’d be able to shoot it by the time you’ve turned around.

 

[Deleted member 3902]

.

 

[joey]

@Youseff true that, but I was more on about realism than game mechanics. But then again where’s the line on which one rules are written for

 

[Tetra]

Can I be refunded for the 80k in items I lost then which @Code Monkey took from me? And will the ban which was placed on @lucis husky be removed since it was this exact scenario

 

[blobvis 2.0]

Any ban may be disputed, stop whining and just make it....

 

[Sam]

@Tetra wait what? You got shot and killed, but still lost your items. How did that happen?

 

[danny]

@blobvis 2.0 how is he whining he was just asking the question lol

 

[Tetra]

@Samuel got revived. And we had a little rp with the cops.
Then Code monkey took me to a roof and said it was either the items or a ban for 3.4. Even though my gun was in attack stance throughout the situtation

 

[Sam]

@Tetra That sounds a bit strange, I actually don’t think that is something that should happen at all, it’s basically a staff member threatening to ban you if you don’t give him your items... if you broke rules, you should be punished, and if such an arrangement is seen appropriate I think a second staff member should handle the sit. Also, enforcers can’t ban people, mod+ can so it shouldn’t be up to him should it?

Sounds like a point that needs brought up during staff meeting

 

[Bnjemann]

If you have a gun in passive stance there’s nothing unrealistic about being able to raise it and shoot the mugger though, that’s what I’ve always believed? Why change it now?

 

[ΙεΙίος1]

Cause I guess you are practically safe from being mugged if you have a pistol in passive stance. Maybe this kind of safety is unwanted.

 

[Tamaninja]

I believe it was changed due to the situation between me and @EiPUS and Code Monkey mugging us on dd when we both me and eipus had pistols on passive

 

[Tetra]

@Samuel

@Dom_ @LEWIS 088 @Madda Care to comment?

since I lost out on quite a lot

 

[Tetra]

This argument is about guns being in attack stance

 

[A1L]

@Tetra What happend? If you're talking about that sit at monorail yesterday what even happend lol

 

[A1L]

@Tetra send me your demo i wanna look through it cause if that happend he can't really lol

 

[Tetra]

@A1L
I can provide a demo if a staff member requests it. I am currently in the process of clipping the entire situtation to make it easier

 

[Code Monkey]

@Samuel That's not what happened and he's being dramatic. I told him he could drop the items or I can look at his record and decide on a punishment from there. @Tetra I would appreciate if you stop slandering me on the forums. There may have been a mix up on the rule and how it is enforced. As you know I have a lot of money and will gladly refund you if we decide in a staff meeting that it is not 3.4. I am simply going off of the conversation I had with Bolli and Lewis 088. Any 3.4 ruling with a mug situation is dealt with this way.

 

[Bert]

@Code Monkey This american staff bias is disgusting! We stand behind you brudda!