Fuck Zergs [Actual Suggestions]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Husky

Husky

Messages
2,339
Reaction score
6,910
Points
805
Location
United Kingdom, Devon
Main idea: Limiting organizations to a MAXIMUM of 10 MEMBERS

Description: Only 10 member slots in organizations at any given time, in addition multiple organizations will not be allowed to team together in an ongoing raid if the members taking place >10 this includes but is not limited to: Flankers, initial contact and late game players (people arriving 10 minutes after the raid has started).
Pros: Stops the whole server being one team.

Cons: Last part could be hard to enforce however I believe its worth the time. @Slayerduck has a point, 1 team of 40 is getting incredibly boring and it leads to the only shootouts being one sided as fuck. :)
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Husky said:
Have you seen the players in the zerg? they are fucking far from experienced, they've been hibernating and powergrowing for the last 4 months to get new cars. You seriously have no idea clearly
Click to expand...
It's so easy for them to get supercars nobody raids them they can get in like 1/2 weeks growing. I remember back in the day it look longer because people actually raided you.
 
Sossa said:
It's so easy for them to get supercars nobody raids them they can get in like 1/2 weeks growing. I remember back in the day it look longer because people actually raided you.
Click to expand...
imagine a guy saying you are experienced but whenever I'm in teamspeak you guys have fucking ALT TABBED AND STARTED PLAYING FORTNITE WHILST GROWING.

LOTS OF XP BRO, I HOPE YOU PRESTIGE SOON
10thprestige.png
hope you get to 10th prestige very fast with all this xp
 
Funnily enough, this type of idea was discussed about at the recent staff meeting about putting a limit on the maximum number of players in an organisation and limiting number of players in a raid because like you and @Slayerduck said, it is quite boring and one-sided when it's usually a team of 40 people in a shootout. However, the other factor that needs to be considered here is to what extent the community would whine about PERP becoming "too restrictive" with organisations being forced to limit their number of members allowed in and can only take a certain amount of people in to raid a property. Furthermore, with recent rule changes such as 5.3 to prevent people who died in the raid flanking or assisting in any way until 30 mins since they respawned has passed, it probably would seem to some that PERP would be "too restrictive".

Personally, I'm quite open to the idea of implementing this change and to see how this would play out when organisations are raiding as it could bring back the good old times where org wars were decent and lasted for good while as well as there being a variety of organisations competing with one another or co-operating to a certain extent. Although from a staff member's point-of-view, I don't see the last option as viable unless there is a work-around because all raids would require a staff member to be spectating and ensuring additional people don't join in on a raid and if there's a limited number of staff where multiple raids are going on at the same time, or no staff on, etc there's no way to enforce this unless people resort to ARs, etc.

Best of luck with your suggestion.
 
Super_ said:
Funnily enough, this type of idea was discussed about at the recent staff meeting about putting a limit on the maximum number of players in an organisation and limiting number of players in a raid because like you and @Slayerduck said, it is quite boring and one-sided when it's usually a team of 40 people in a shootout. However, the other factor that needs to be considered here is to what extent the community would whine about PERP becoming "too restrictive" with organisations being forced to limit their number of members allowed in and can only take a certain amount of people in to raid a property. Furthermore, with recent rule changes such as 5.3 to prevent people who died in the raid flanking or assisting in any way until 30 mins since they respawned has passed, it probably would seem to some that PERP would be "too restrictive".

Personally, I'm quite open to the idea of implementing this change and to see how this would play out when organisations are raiding as it could bring back the good old times where org wars were decent and lasted for good while as well as there being a variety of organisations competing with one another or co-operating to a certain extent. Although from a staff member's point-of-view, I don't see the last option as viable unless there is a work-around because all raids would require a staff member to be spectating and ensuring additional people don't join in on a raid and if there's a limited number of staff where multiple raids are going on at the same time, or no staff on, etc there's no way to enforce this unless people resort to ARs, etc.

Best of luck with your suggestion.
Click to expand...
If something like this isn't implemented and orgs aren't forced to split and go to war you can ensure the player count stays in the shitter, goodluck with the staff meeting, hopefully you make the CORRECT choice. = )
 
Super_ said:
Funnily enough, this type of idea was discussed about at the recent staff meeting about putting a limit on the maximum number of players in an organisation and limiting number of players in a raid because like you and @Slayerduck said, it is quite boring and one-sided when it's usually a team of 40 people in a shootout. However, the other factor that needs to be considered here is to what extent the community would whine about PERP becoming "too restrictive" with organisations being forced to limit their number of members allowed in and can only take a certain amount of people in to raid a property. Furthermore, with recent rule changes such as 5.3 to prevent people who died in the raid flanking or assisting in any way until 30 mins since they respawned has passed, it probably would seem to some that PERP would be "too restrictive".

Personally, I'm quite open to the idea of implementing this change and to see how this would play out when organisations are raiding as it could bring back the good old times where org wars were decent and lasted for good while as well as there being a variety of organisations competing with one another or co-operating to a certain extent. Although from a staff member's point-of-view, I don't see the last option as viable unless there is a work-around because all raids would require a staff member to be spectating and ensuring additional people don't join in on a raid and if there's a limited number of staff where multiple raids are going on at the same time, or no staff on, etc there's no way to enforce this unless people resort to ARs, etc.

Best of luck with your suggestion.
Click to expand...
restricting the amount of people in a raid is kinda annoying when you can have 16 cops on duty, if something like this was to be implemented the cap on the amount of players during a raid must atleast be like 20 so on occasion you still outnumber the cops making chance of survival a little higher otherwise people just wouldn't risk raiding since the risk ain't as good as the reward.
 
Knoxy82 said:
restricting the amount of people in a raid is kinda annoying when you can have 16 cops on duty, if something like this was to be implemented the cap on the amount of players during a raid must atleast be like 20 so on occasion you still outnumber the cops making chance of survival a little higher otherwise people just wouldn't risk raiding since the risk ain't as good as the reward.
Click to expand...
No, no and no. You have more equipment than them 95% of the time. Don't understand why this issue has suddenly become a thing, PD aren't OP and they never have been. They've been getting stomped on for years they are just slowly closing the gap. I like how hard gunfights are now and 20 fucking people in 1 raid? no thanks. Skill>Numbers.
 
The most fun I remember on PERP was when 2 smaller orgs were having wars with actual RP such as sit downs and spies ect. So I think the idea of maybe limiting orgs could go well and maybe have it a bit higher such as 12-15?
 
Ethan said:
The most fun I remember on PERP was when 2 smaller orgs were having wars with actual RP such as sit downs and spies ect. So I think the idea of maybe limiting orgs could go well and maybe have it a bit higher such as 12-15?
Click to expand...
I'd like a maximum of 20 members in each org but a maximum of 10 within a raid... would be difficult to setup and finalize but the staff team have enough time to do so
 
Husky said:
I'd like a maximum of 20 members in each org but a maximum of 10 within a raid... would be difficult to setup and finalize but the staff team have enough time to do so
Click to expand...

Ah, I misunderstood you, my bad :) But I agree 100% with this suggestion then.
 
Sossa said:
It's so easy for them to get supercars nobody raids them they can get in like 1/2 weeks growing. I remember back in the day it look longer because people actually raided you.
Click to expand...
arnt u in a zerg?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Exnem
  • Suggestion Suggestion
Remove OOC limit
Replies
9
Views
926
ΙεΙίος1
ΙεΙίος1
CABRAMS
  • Suggestion Suggestion
Cooldown to raid PD
2
Replies
24
Views
1K
Super_
Super_
Mxdium
  • Locked
  • Suggestion Suggestion
More OOC messages or a different solution
Replies
4
Views
720
TinySlayer
TinySlayer
Mage
  • Locked
  • Suggestion Suggestion
5.7 - Engaging in criminal activity
Replies
8
Views
2K
Itzryzo
Itzryzo
travis
  • Locked
  • Suggestion Suggestion
[Suggestion] Change to rule 5.3
2 3
Replies
42
Views
3K
Cole
Cole
Back
Top