Should staff be adding rare items into the economy to compensate for ones owned by permabanned players?

If a player with a rare, limited number item is banned, what should be done

  • Depends on the item really

    Votes: 4 19.0%
  • Another one should be put into circulation somehow

    Votes: 3 14.3%
  • The item should remain lost in the banned players storage, as it makes the item rarer.

    Votes: 16 76.2%
  • I don’t know

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    21
Messages
9,668
Reaction score
12,062
Points
975
Location
REHAB
Just a quick thought.

When a user who owns a limited holiday Doll, or another rare item receives a permanent ban, that item is lost forever (or at least for the foreseeable future) whilst owners who are not banned always possibly could sell their holiday dolls to other players. Banned players, however, cannot do this, and by being banned, that’s 1 rare item taken out of potential circulation.

On the other hand, theres little point in having a “spawned in” holiday doll thats got 2015-2017 in the name but was actually spawned in in 2020+, also, in the event of that player being unbanned, their holiday doll would effectively Be sellable again.

what do you think?
 
no-stock-illustration_csp19967382.jpg
 
Seems pointless, way too much work and just a weird thing in general
 
Back
Top