@obidan66 To know something about the current issue, you don't need to know the entire fucking history of the server. It's well past 5 years ago, it doesn't fucking matter. Find a modern solution that doesn't require the community to have been here for 5 years. Literally 90% of the playerbase is newer than that, so why are you trying to start a topic that only 10% of the community is (in your words) allowed to take part in? Makes no sense.
Ban on non-roleplay organizations
- Thread starter obidan66
- Start date
- Status
take a look at the announcements I've been tagged in
the bug testing/update testing I've been a part of
the fact ive actually made a suggestion unlike yourself
- Thread starter
- #44
So simply because of the fact that something has been broken for a long time, we shouldn't fix it because the new players don't know what a working state looks like and therefore it wouldn't be fair for them to not be able to voice their uninformed opinion? Now that's rather interesting.
@obidan66 Never said I have a solution... Please for the love of god, just read what I'm writing so I don't have to keep repeating myself.......
Despite that, this suggestion will change fuck-all lol. Times have changed since 2015 mate. It's not the same, and it wouldn't work the same now as it did then. You're pretty much killing off the remaining active organizations with this suggestion in exchange of getting maybe 3 or 4 people's enjoyment. Plain stupid.
Despite that, this suggestion will change fuck-all lol. Times have changed since 2015 mate. It's not the same, and it wouldn't work the same now as it did then. You're pretty much killing off the remaining active organizations with this suggestion in exchange of getting maybe 3 or 4 people's enjoyment. Plain stupid.
- Thread starter
- #49
Very well then, you've proven your point. I do apologize for any wrongful accusations Ive made against you, but I do feel like we're moving away from the actual topic to a personal battle, which is not what I want with anyone here nor why I suggested this. Constructive criticism is of course totally fine and I understand it, this suggestion wont be liked by many, but please dont include any cheap shots / direct attacks against me, not concerning the suggestion itself, please do it over DMs or my profile.
- Thread starter
- #50
@KeiwaM Well, I do appreciate your opinion and will take it into consideration, however, I do feel differently. Also since you don't have any other suggestion on a more "modern solution" to the problem, then we really can't proceed in the argument any further, as really neither of us is willing to change their mind. But in any case, thanks for voicing your opinion.
Just because someone else doesn't have a counter idea doesn't automatically mean that your idea is a good one.
Also WHAT problem? The organisations work perfectly fine in the server theres no problem there to solve
Also WHAT problem? The organisations work perfectly fine in the server theres no problem there to solve
- Thread starter
- #53
Both valid opinions, which I disagree with. Respectfully, I do see a problem and I voiced its full extent in the main post above. Also Samsterminator, I do see a problem and I do feel differently than you do, which is fine as well.
What I think Eddie is trying to say is that there's not much of any roleplaying going on in organisations anymore, sure enough this not be the right approach to the problem, but what he is saying is that back in the days we used to have actual roleplaying going on between organisations, now it's just a raid and defend situation between organisations.
What he wants back are those actual roleplaying situations where organisation leaders had meetings and pacts with organisations were formed.
I could be wrong though
What he wants back are those actual roleplaying situations where organisation leaders had meetings and pacts with organisations were formed.
I could be wrong though
If this is actually what he means, he should really hire you to remake this thread, because I got a completely different read out of his post. This I can actually get behind. But I still idk how you are just gonna ban orgs for not roleplaying.
- Thread starter
- #59
You're pretty much right, but I'm hoping for that to be the result, not the action itself. I'm hoping that by banning non-roleplay groups / FailRP organizations, we can achieve a more roleplay oriented and functional perpheads with less toxicity and more functionality as it was originally intended and as it was proven to work almost flawlessly in the past.
- Thread starter
- #60
@KeiwaM See thats where we disagree. I believe that because of that fact that now this ban could be enforced, "minge" / FailRP organizations would be non-existent on the forums and gone from being openly promoted, the mentality of the player base would once again shift towards well made, thought out organizations with a theme and a story, ultimately leading to a more functional and roleplay present community.
- Status
