/Phone mate i said I'm neutral some don't some do i don't.mind. it's up to the staff team
? You were a moderator previously and you played your part as much as you could but those days are over, I'm afraid.
So I'll toss in my two cents; I don't think you're ready.
Allow me to elaborate, I think you're an alright guy Riekelt, but when under any scrutiny or criticism, regardless of reasoning, you absolutely cannot be reasonable. Your reactions to the lack of support on this thread are very immature.
There's paraphrasing, and then there is taking the piss.
Also, insinuating that because of a player's forum community presence, they are unable, or unworthy of criticising you, is a cunt thing to do, period. I'm guilty of doing it in the past, but I know I'm an asshole.
I also don't think you can be objective, or fair in an administrative situation. The evidence presented in this thread, and in your last application is, in my opinion proof of; abuse of powers, and clear lack of objectivity. Not to mention personal experience with you. After a rather stupid, ill-timed decision of mine to enter the PD to kill an officer who fired at me after a raid I was confronted with the officers with NLR standing there, I then shot you. I was taken off guard and wasn't thinking properly, and was able to admit my mistake in the administrative situation thereafter, and explain how I came to make such a mistake, and, if I am not mistaken, I both apologised then and there, and prior to the situation after being killed, realising my mistake. What I was taken aback by was how rude and unobjective you were in the situation thereafter, with no sympathy or understanding of my stupid mistake. This is all understandable, however from someone who was once a staff member, and who seems to be hell-bent on returning to that role even after being forced to resign, due to allegations of abuse of power, with evidence to back this up, it shows that in my honest opinion, you would not be suited to the role, just as you were not suited to it prior.
You're like a politician. You cannot admit that you're wrong, you ignore or attempt to twist any evidence or claims made against you. When there is evidence of abuse. You claim that because you weren't 'demoted' then the evidence shown is unfounded, or false in some way. You claim your inactivity is due to personal reasons, and it may well be, I won't question this, but your activity, in my opinion has been pretty awful for several months now, more so than others. Though this is understandable due to exams, and I imagine my activity is just as bad, if not worse, the problem in my eyes is, you attempt to justify it, or make excuses for it.
Anyway, I want to go watch the rest of the debate on TV, so I'll just leave it here.
You're the last kind of person I'd want to see a staff member.
