Deleted member 4983
Guest
@Ethan
1.
I'll forfeit that it was misworded, and I probably meant the economy is not an economy between the players or something along the lines of that, but the fact remains that the economy will not be ruined by an inflated amount of money in the system.
The fact of the matter remains that the inflated amount of money will either dissapear from the economy either by purchases of vehicles or purchases of materials thus stabilising it, prices of items are still fixed and are generated by the supply of money.
When buying materials the money will dissapear and not flow back into the economy.
Nobody is going to keep that 5 mil in their bank when it could be put to much greater use.
I'd much prefer lower gun prices accompanied by lower drug yields or as @John Daymon greater chance for drug loss to occur.
Sometimes I want to be a roadcrew, but this is nearly fucking impossible considering I make fuck all compared to growing drugs.
Also other legal ways to put my money to use.
2.
Yes, removing the cops would be good for criminals but the fact of the matter is that removing the Police would be bad for the Police.
Therefore it is not by definition a good, as I would argue the costs outweigh the benefits.
3.
"I still don't understand how people can demand a reduction in gun prices whilst being able to grow for 4 rifles in 1 hour. The economy is broken.
"
Seems to me like you're making that argument.
1.
I'll forfeit that it was misworded, and I probably meant the economy is not an economy between the players or something along the lines of that, but the fact remains that the economy will not be ruined by an inflated amount of money in the system.
The fact of the matter remains that the inflated amount of money will either dissapear from the economy either by purchases of vehicles or purchases of materials thus stabilising it, prices of items are still fixed and are generated by the supply of money.
When buying materials the money will dissapear and not flow back into the economy.
Nobody is going to keep that 5 mil in their bank when it could be put to much greater use.
I'd much prefer lower gun prices accompanied by lower drug yields or as @John Daymon greater chance for drug loss to occur.
Sometimes I want to be a roadcrew, but this is nearly fucking impossible considering I make fuck all compared to growing drugs.
Also other legal ways to put my money to use.
2.
Yes, removing the cops would be good for criminals but the fact of the matter is that removing the Police would be bad for the Police.
Therefore it is not by definition a good, as I would argue the costs outweigh the benefits.
3.
"I still don't understand how people can demand a reduction in gun prices whilst being able to grow for 4 rifles in 1 hour. The economy is broken.
"
Seems to me like you're making that argument.
Last edited by a moderator: